Candy Cane Lane Review: Ho-Ho-Haphazard Holiday Hokum

Well-Meaning Yuletide Subversion Trips Over Indulgent Eccentricities

The holiday season brings a flurry of Christmas movies trying to capture that familiar dose of cheer, family bonding, and tidings of comfort and joy. But leave it to Eddie Murphy to put a twisted spin on the genre with “Candy Cane Lane,” his gonzo collaboration with director Reginald Hudlin. This rambunctious comedy-fantasy sees Murphy as Chris Carver, a decorating fanatic who gets fired right before Christmas. Desperate for cash, Chris enters his neighborhood’s high-stakes holiday lights contest. But after a fateful visit to a strange pop-up shop, Chris unwittingly unleashes a tidal wave of yuletide chaos.

As you might guess from its title, “Candy Cane Lane” stays true to the Christmas movie tradition of prioritizing maximum festiveness over things like plot logic or restraint. Hudlin turns the holiday hijinks up to 11, cramming the film with ludicrous set pieces involving the characters from “The 12 Days of Christmas.” Yes, you read that correctly. It’s a very merry acid trip down Candy Cane Lane, anchored by Murphy’s signature charm along with a dependably bubbly Tracee Ellis Ross as his wife.

So pour yourself some spiked eggnog and get ready, because this wild ride of a Christmas caper plays by its own rulebook. All things considered, Hudlin and Murphy have whipped up an enjoyably offbeat serving of holiday comfort food – even if “Candy Cane Lane” is several fruitcakes short of a classic.

Yuletide Havoc on Candy Cane Lane

The whimsical title hides a surprisingly high-stakes predicament for Chris Carver and his picture-perfect suburban family. As “Candy Cane Lane” opens, Chris is full of holiday cheer as he lovingly hand-carves decorations for his neighborhood’s annual Christmas lights competition. But Chris’s world is rocked when he gets laid off right before the holidays.

With college tuition and bills piling up, Chris becomes obsessed with the contest’s new $100,000 cash prize. During a desperate shopping spree for decorations, Chris and his daughter Holly discover a strange pop-up shop run by the creepy Pepper. Seduced by Pepper’s elaborate wares, Chris splurges on an ornate “Twelve Days of Christmas” tree and unwittingly signs his life away.

The real chaos kicks in when the tree’s characters vanish. Chris awakes to find the seven swans a-swimming in his pool, lords a-leaping crashing his daughter’s track meet – the whole nonsensical gamut. Turns out Pepper is a vengeful fallen elf, magically springing the song’s creatures to life to torment Chris. Unless the family can complete a ludicrous scavenger hunt for golden rings, Chris will join the elf’s collection of tiny porcelain victims (voiced by the likes of Nick Offerman and Chris Redd).

What follows is a collision between the sentimental and the absurd as the Carvers race to break Pepper’s wacky curse. Murphy and a bubbly Tracee Ellis Ross bring warmth to the parents’ bond amid all the looney tunes antics swirling around their family. It’s easy to get whiplash between the story’s earnest and eccentric modes, veering wildly from holiday hijinks like crank-calling birds to genuinely unsettling supernatural elements. But if nothing else, “Candy Cane Lane” earns points for unpredictability.

Indulge in the Delicious Tale of Waitress: The Musical: Get ready to be captivated by the story of Jenna and her dream of a better life. Check out our detailed review of Waitress: The Musical and see why this musical is a must-see for theater lovers.

Clashing Yuletide Vibes on Candy Cane Lane

Hollywood has produced no shortage of Christmas cheer on screen, but “Candy Cane Lane” mines the season for more eccentric inspiration. Director Reginald Hudlin mashes up the cozy trappings of family holiday flicks with splashy magical realism, dark supernatual forces, and caustic satire. It’s certainly a unique recipe – though the ingredients don’t always fuse together neatly.

Candy Cane Lane Review

On paper, Chris Carver embodies the wholesome Christmas patriarch devoted to spreading seasonal joy. But after losing his job, his obsession with an extravagant light display reflects the greedy impulses Pepper and her contrived elf tasks are meant to punish. The theme of embracing the true spirit of Christmas versus crass commercialism is familiar, but the movie struggles to pick a tone to convey it.

Scenes ping-pong between innocuous and sinister vibes. One minute the Carvers are chasing geese around their lawn, the next they’re uncovering the creepy fate of Pepper’s porcelain captives. Murphy and Ross make for appealing leads, grounding things in humor and heart – but it’s tough for audiences to get situational whiplash between snarky satire and family holiday hijinks.

Where “Candy Cane Lane” really goes off the rails is marrying these mismatched styles with the bombastic presence of characters from the novelty carol. The absurdity peaks during paradoxical moments like lords a-leaping interrupting a track meet or hens laying eggs mid-air raid style. The messy magic system and unclear mythology around Pepper make it hard to take the kooky threats seriously, dampening the spirited momentum.

There’s kitschy appeal in seeing this destabilized spin on pettier neighborhood holiday movie tropes. But once you get past the initial novelty factor, “Candy Cane Lane” lacks the tonal harmony and sharp cultural skewering that could cement its oddball niche.

Standout Stars Can’t Save Candy Cane Lane’s Loopiness

Amidst all the tonal turbulence, the talented cast of “Candy Cane Lane” provides moments of comfort. As Chris Carver, Eddie Murphy taps into his signature charm while layering the dad role with a soulful melancholy once his job loss threatens holiday stability. Even as the zany narrative derails around him, Murphy keeps the heart intact.

The perpetually radiant Tracee Ellis Ross matches Murphy’s shine as Chris’ wife, Carol. Ross is a master of keeping it bubbly even when chaos reigns – a skill on full display here. As the grounded voice of reason, Carol tries steering her family through Pepper’s demented demands. Sparks fly in moments conveying the couple’s bond, providing warmth against the story’s darker detours.

The young actors playing the Carver kids also impress, from Genneya Walton’s underwritten eldest to Madison Thomas as wide-eyed daughter Holly. But the weak link comes from Jillian Bell’s shrill and unfocused turn as Pepper the scorned elf, which leans hard into awkward excess minus enough menace or wit.

It’s no shock that Murphy and Ross stand out in easily the most appealing roles. But much of the human element gets overshadowed once Hudlin starts piling on the cranked-up set pieces involving leaping lords and piping pipers. For all its fussed-over folly, Candy Cane Lane could have better served its anchors – especially at a time when Murphy’s comeback has positioned him for more substantial seasonal fare.

Shaky Direction and Editing Undercut Quirky Vision

Even grading on a curve given the premise, “Candy Cane Lane” displays unpolished technical execution that muddles its eccentric aspirations. From flat cinematography to choppy editing, the seams frequently show in Hudlin’s clumsy staging of the chaotic Yuletide antics.

Considering California’s lack of wintry atmosphere, vivid production design might have better established the festive mood. But location shooting leaves the film looking oddly drab and dull rather than glittering with holiday spirit. The camerawork also lacks visual flair, relying on workmanlike medium shots void of personality.

Uneven CGI only amplifies the visual mediocrity once characters from the twelve days explode into the real world. From swimming swans to aerial egg bombers, the effects land pretty squarely in cheap and chintzy territory. The digitized porcelain figurines trapped in Pepper’s shop fare better, benefiting from amusing voice work even if the conceit remains muddled.

These technical flaws reflect broader issues with Kelly Younger’s sloppy script pile-driving various half-formed ideas into one hallucinatory package. Scenes ramble without tight narrative focus, while the abrupt tonal shifts give audiences whiplash between absurdity and sentimentality. Poor pacing drags out throwaway subplots involving bit players like dueling local reporters.

Sloppy editing compounds the disjointed feel as actual character development fights for oxygen. We get intriguing glimpses of family tensions between Chris and his kids, but they become afterthoughts compared to sprawling set pieces involving loud CGI spectacle. Quieter moments stall out halfway through establishing compelling emotional stakes.

For all its enjoyably surreal concepts, Hudlin’s execution lacks the visual inventiveness or editing discipline to tie “Candy Cane Lane’s” eccentricities together. Choppy structure and dull aesthetics waste the charming moments Murphy and Ross conjure amidst the chaotic fray. If nothing else, the film makes a case for streaming holiday features needing higher production value standards.

Candy Cane Lane Misses the Sweet Spot for Subversive Holiday Films

In recent years, Hollywood has experimented with subverting expectations of cozy Christmas movies through dark comedy or horror – from the Violent Night action spectacle to efforts like Krampus. So Candy Cane Lane continues this trend of genre reinvention, mashing up the competition premise popularized by Deck the Halls with fantastical elements. But it lacks the sharp comedic bite or emotional resonance needed to freshen up the formula.

The basic building blocks echo cheerful classics trading in neighborhood rivalry taken to extremes in pursuit of holiday glory. But the concept goes off the rails once creepy elf shopkeeper Pepper enters the picture, introducing heavy doses of magic and chaos seemingly at random. Hudlin deserves some credit for unpredictability as the story shape-shifts from absurdist to sinister and back on a dime.

Yet the undeveloped satire lacks enough substance or witty insights into materialism run amok during the holidays, while the tonal whiplash grows more jarring than darkly comedic. Without deeper thematic grounding, the quirky twists come across as all spectacle, no substance. There’s a way to thoughtfully modernize the Christmas genre, but the messy execution herefried falls well short of contemporary peers that have made it look effortless.

For all its unhinged moments, Candy Cane Lane never fully commits to tapping the inherent freakiness of something like a perverted Santa’s workshop. And its half-baked commentary on greed means it misses the charm mark set by touchstones like Elf that skillfully balance humor with genuinely uplifting messages about holiday spirit. This trip down Christmas memory lane ultimately leads to a dead end rather than destination joy.

A Mixed Bag of Nuts That Never Quite Lands the Holiday High Note

After stuffing audiences full of oddball antics, “Candy Cane Lane” unfortunately leaves that unsatisfied feeling of reaching the bottom of the stocking. For all its whimsical weirdness, Hudlin’s genre mashup lacks the finesse or emotional payoff expected from a premium holiday feature. Fans of Murphy and Ross will likely still find moments of mirth buried amidst the tonal disarray. But the messy execution prevents Candy Cane Lane from wowing like a classic Christmas spectacle.

While far from boring, the film ultimately serves as a case study for why tightly streamlined storytelling matters – even within Christmas chaos. Ambitious efforts to inject fresh eccentricity into the tired formula deserve some applause. But without thoughtful commentary or skillfully rendered characters, the wacky wizardry falls flat. Pepper’s elaborate supernatural punishments reflect little substance beneath the CGI sheen and arbitrary rule-changing.

That’s not to say kids won’t get a kick out of seeing the “Twelve Days” crew unleashed on suburbia, logic be damned. Yet adults are left piecing together thematic crumbs when they should be reveling in marital chemistry between Murphy and Ross. For all its celebratory snippets, Candy Cane Lane never taps that signature holiday magic needed to overlook its foibles.

Maybe expecting too much heart was foolish given the directors’ brands. But seeing Murphy’s comedic gifts squandered once more in a high-concept fantasy calls for some seasonal soul-searching from streaming industry gatekeepers. If Hollywood keeps half-baking their holiday fare, a lump of coal may be the only worthy rating.

The Review

Candy Cane Lane

4 Score

Candy Cane Lane brings home the holiday hijinks but ultimately crumbles under the weight of its own overindulgent eccentricities. Murphy and Ross provide flickers of warmth amidst the chaotic frenzy, but choppy storytelling and uninspired messaging can’t save this overstuffed Christmas caper from leaving audiences hungry for finer festive fare. This trip down memory lane leads to a dead end rather than destination joy.

PROS

  • Eddie Murphy and Tracee Ellis Ross have strong comedic chemistry and bring charm
  • Ambitious and unpredictable twist on generic Christmas movie formulas
  • Amusingly bizarre creature effects bringing the "Twelve Days" song to life
  • Creative visuals and production design for the elf's Christmas shop
  • Some sharp satire and witty jokes poking fun at holiday commercialism

CONS

  • Messy plot tries to stuff too many strands and styles without focus
  • Tonal whiplash between earnest family comedy and dark supernatural forces
  • CGI effects of Christmas creatures are cheesy and uneven
  • heavy-handed themes lack nuance
  • The evil elf villain is a pretty one-note caricature
  • Choppy editing with strange pacing and undeveloped subplots
  • Lacks visual flair despite the over-the-top premise
  • Satirical elements come across Hollow rather than incisive
  • Conclusion feels rushed and unfinished thematically

Review Breakdown

  • Overall 4
Exit mobile version