Bad Faith Review: A Sobering Wake-Up Call

Tracing the Threat to American Pluralism

Co-directors Stephen Ujlaki and Chris Jones delve deep into an alarming movement in their documentary “Bad Faith“. The film examines the history and rise of Christian nationalism in America, sharing perspectives from academics, pastors, and political figures. Christian nationalism sees the United States as a Christian nation, prioritizing Christianity over other faiths.

Supporters of this ideology believe America’s laws and government should enforce Christian values and beliefs. Over time, the movement has increasingly embraced a radical agenda. Interviews help illustrate how followers interpret the Bible as a political manifesto rather than a religious text. Events like the January 6th attack on the Capitol are portrayed as a foreshadowing of the movement’s disturbing aims and tactics.

Through profiles of influential leaders and strategists, “Bad Faith” traces how Christian nationalism developed and expanded its influence. The film argues that this growing threat endangers democracy by seeking to impose sectarian rule. With its thorough examination of origins and modern influence, the documentary aims to alert viewers to the dangers of Christian nationalism and its insidious mission to reshape America according to a narrow theological vision.

The Roots of a Political Force

To understand how Christian nationalism became such a dominant political force, we need to look back at its origins in the 1970s. The documentary reveals some notable events that helped launch the movement. In 1971, a court ruling stripped tax-exempt status from private schools that practiced racial discrimination. This infuriated many Southern pastors with segregated congregations.

It was this policy, not opposition to abortion, that truly mobilized two key early figures: Reverend Jerry Falwell and activist Paul Weyrich. Seeing an opportunity, Weyrich approached Falwell about forming a political organization. In 1976, they founded what would become the Moral Majority. Through clever marketing and Falwell’s TV and radio access, they helped spread their conservative message.

While often remembered for its anti-abortion stance, the Moral Majority initially focused more on economic issues important to evangelical Christians. Weyrich wanted to unite various factions under a single banner. He was a skilled strategist who understood the power of grassroots organizations. By the late 1970s, the Moral Majority had over 2 million members.

Despite Falwell receiving the most publicity, the film depicts Weyrich as the true visionary and driving force. He saw that cultural issues could capture evangelical passion. When Roe v. Wade passed in 1973, Weyrich took note and began emphasizing anti-abortion rhetoric. However, Falwell was still reluctant to address the issue as late as 1978. Weyrich had to continually nudge him to make abortion a wedge in the Christian Right.

Tragically, the movement flourished by cultivating division and fear. But it succeeded in pulling many evangelicals into the political sphere. By the 1980 election, the Moral Majority had helped propel Ronald Reagan into the White House. This cemented the Christian Right as a formidable player in conservative politics for decades to come.

The Strategist Behind the Scenes

While Falwell drew most of the attention early on, “Bad Faith” reveals Paul Weyrich as the real mastermind coordinating the Christian right. As one interviewee states, Weyrich saw this as decades in the making. He understood that cultural battlefronts could stir religious passions more than any political issue alone.

Bad Faith Review

Weyrich worked tirelessly, promoting figures like Falwell and ideas that cultivated divisions. He founded the influential Council for National Policy in 1981, providing a key platform. Through this, Weyrich had access to a vast network across right-wing circles. The documentary shows how he utilized this network to solidify Republican allegiance to religious conservatism.

More disturbing is a manifesto Weyrich authored late in life. In it, he outlines a strategy for “bleeding the culture dry” and “weakening and destroying institutions.” He calls for guerilla warfare-style insurrection. Though these ideas seemed radical when penned, the film draws a straight line from Weyrich’s rhetoric to the ideological positions now mainstream in the GOP.

By profiling Weyrich’s strategic long-game, “Bad Faith” puts the rise of Christian nationalism into a broader context. Viewers gain insight into how disparate threads were expertly woven together over decades into the influential force it is today. The documentary suggests Weyrich’s vision has inspired plans as ambitious as “Project 2025,” hinting the movement may only be growing bolder in the coming years.

The Growing Threat of Christian Dominionism

Bad Faith takes a deep dive into the troubling rise of Christian nationalism. Through insightful interviews, it helps define this movement that “privileges Christianity over all other faiths” and seeks to impose that view on others.

We hear how it really started gaining force in the 1970s. Figures like Falwell wanted to keep their tax exemptions while discriminating. So movement leaders seized on issues like abortion to politicize evangelical voters. Over time, the goal shifted from moral issues to gaining outright power.

The documentary reveals how Paul Weyrich ingeniously drove this change. Through networks like the Council for National Policy, he pulled political and religious strings behind the scenes. Weyrich even authored disturbing manifestos calling for insurrection and destroying opposing institutions.

Most startling are clips from the January 6th attack. Among the rioters, Christian imagery and messages are everywhere. Certain pastors are shown blatantly urging their followers to violence. It’s jarring to see extremist beliefs physically manifesting in attempts to subvert democracy.

Through in-depth coverage, Bad Faith illustrates how the threat of Christian dominionism has evolved from an ideological movement to an intensely radicalized force. There is no doubt this poses grave dangers if allowed to continue growing unchecked. The film puts a spotlight on suppressing religious interference in politics before it’s too late to preserve our democratic values of freedom and equality.

Divine Deception

One of the biggest surprises of the documentary is how Christian nationalists united behind Donald Trump. After all, the man embodies everything most religions claim to oppose.

But Bad Faith unravels their rationale. The first was courting the movement’s support by backing their slate of judges and shifting stances on abortion. This transaction alone revealed their true priorities.

However, things went much further. The film explores narratives used to reframe Trump as almost a heavenly figure. He wasn’t expected to follow Christian laws himself; he just served the cause. We hear he was portrayed as a modern King Cyrus—a pagan ruler unwittingly helping God’s people.

This distorted logic casts their supposed moral obligation aside. Instead, it sanctified self-interest under the guise of divine will. By presenting Trump as a chosen vessel, no matter his actions, leaders gained total control.

Most concerning is that this deception has given license to extremism. Without accountability, movement members feel justified in anything that furthers their control. The Capitol attack made clear where such toxic ideas can lead.

By scrutinizing this alliance, Bad Faith shines a light on the hollowness of such claims to faith. In reality, as the documentary suggests, Christian nationalism appears more driven by greed and a thirst for authority than any spiritual beliefs. This alliance may have fulfilled short-term goals, but it risks dismantling the very democracy it claims to defend.

Christian Nationalism: A Looming Threat

The documentary provides troubling insights into Christian nationalism. We hear from academics who’ve studied how this movement conflicts with our democracy’s core values.

Randall Balmer, a religious historian, notes how America’s foundation proudly upheld religious diversity. The Founders ensured no single faith could dominate politics. Yet Christian nationalism seeks to impose beliefs on others through law and policy.

Ivy League theologians also argue that this contradicts Christianity’s core teaching of individual choice. You can’t truly follow Christ if that decision isn’t freely made. Their agenda undermines both faith and freedom.

Scenes from Capitol Attack unsettle as participants recite extremist slogans. One bears a sign saying, “Let God Burn Them.” It’s chilling how leaders fuel intolerance through fear and lies.

Elizabeth Neumann, a former homeland security official, reveals US agencies have long ignored this threat. Her insights show extremism now motivates a notable portion of one major party.

Interviews discuss the GOP’s drifting further right to court such views. Once-fringe congresspeople and ideas now dictate policy. The platform increasingly promotes theocracy over citizen rights.

It’s sobering that Christian nationalists could number over 80 million Americans. With money and data mining, they influence more elections. If granted power, what liberties might next be lost to insecure rulers seeking dominance?

Throughout, the documentary raises serious concerns. In tracing its origins and recent rise, it paints a portrait of a still-growing force that could undermine democracy for generations to come if left unchallenged in the closing years of this decade.

“Bad Faith” Lays Bare the Threat

This documentary packs a serious message into just under two hours. Directors Stephen Ujlaki and Chris Jones trace how Christian nationalism has evolved its agenda, endangering democracy.

Through historical context and present-day interviews, pieces fall into place, revealing an organized drive for power. Figures like Paul Weyrich worked steadily to align grassroots enthusiasm with billionaire backers.

Now extremist teachings spread through huge churches and media networks. Leaders stoked anger, portraying themselves as persecuted. They frame participation in governance as a holy duty, yet reject process if losing.

The film doesn’t sensationalize. It lets experts and insiders testify about collaboration with Trump. Though some saw him as a tool, others frankly pursued theocracy. Footage from the Capitol attack shows where such rhetoric leads.

By outlining parallels to past totalitarian regimes, this film compels us to heed warning signs. Its calm analysis counters hostility with the truth. While religious belief deserves respect, pluralism and the consent of the governed are also American ideals.

Ujlaki and Jones perform a public service, alerting all to carefully study this growing force. None wish to see oppression disguised as faith. After viewing, one better understands democracy as the ally of both security and spiritual freedom.

The Review

Bad Faith

9 Score

"Bad Faith" presents an urgent yet judicious examination of a formidable challenge. With careful research and insightful interviews, it illuminates the strategy and goals of Christian nationalism. While their agenda could undermine constitutional freedoms and majority rule, the film maintains an impartial tone. It allows experts with varied perspectives to make their case. Rather than making accusations, Ujlaki and Jones let sobering facts speak for themselves, helping viewers grasp this complex phenomenon. Overall, it proves a revelatory work on a movement reshaping American politics.

PROS

  • Thoroughly researched the origins and growth of the Christian nationalist movement
  • Presented a factual and well-rounded analysis without sensationalism.
  • Featured expert commentary from academics, pastors, and political strategists
  • Provided historical context to understand current political dynamics.
  • Effectively sounded the alarm about the risks to democracy posed by this agenda.

CONS

  • Some may find the subject matter politically charged or controversial.
  • Could have examined specific Christian nationalist figures and organizations in more depth.
  • Lacked suggestions for countering their influence beyond awareness-raising.

Review Breakdown

  • Overall 9
Exit mobile version