What Remains Review: An Intriguing Mystery with Wasted Potential

Based in 1990s Sweden, What Remains tells the haunting true crime story of a man named Mads Lake, played superbly by Gustaf Skarsgård. Institutionalized for years in a psychiatric hospital, Mads is just starting to build a new life when accusations arise that he murdered several young boys in the past.

Therapist Anna Rudebeck, brought to life vividly by Andrea Riseborough, and troubled detective Sören Rank, portrayed intensely by Stellan Skarsgård, try to untangle the disturbing knots of Mads’ memories to get to the unsettling truth.

Directed by Ran Huang, What Remains delves deeply into the dark themes of trauma, memory, and humanity’s capacity for both good and evil. Mads’ backstory involves terrible abuse that could drive anyone mad, yet the crimes he’s accused of are inconceivably monstrous.

Did he really commit such atrocities, or are his troubled recollections the distorted output of a tortured mind? Anna and Sören are likewise wrestling with personal demons as they probe Mads’ psyche, hoping for justice or redemption but finding only more questions.

A meticulously crafted character study rather than a fast-paced thriller, What Remains demands the viewer’s full attention to appreciate its layered exploration of morality and the human condition. Though undeniably bleak in its haunting depiction of torment, both mental and criminal, this film offers an unforgettable cinematic achievement through its powerhouse performances and thoughtful insight into lives scarred by evil’s far reach.

The Twisted Confessions of Mads Lake

The film follows Mads Lake, a man who has spent years confined to a psychiatric hospital in Sweden after confessing to multiple horrific crimes as a teenager. We learn that Mads endured severe abuse from his father from a young age. Though he appeared to be making progress in the institution, accusations from his past refuse to stay buried.

Enter Anna Rudebeck, a mental health professional with her own troubled history. She takes a keen interest in Mads’ case and believes exploring his memories could help his recovery process. Detective Soren Rank is also wary of letting Mads out, hoping new information could provide long-sought answers to unsolved crimes.

At their urging, Mads begins recounting twisted past events in disturbing detail. He graphically describes committing unspeakable acts of violence against children. But are these recollections the truth or the distorted experiences of a tortured mind? Mads himself cannot say for certain anymore.

As Mads’ confessions continue, Anna and Soren’s motivations also come into question. Both harbor deep personal wounds that cloud their judgment. Anna forms an unusually close bond with Mads, convinced of his humanity, despite the horrors he describes. Soren is driven by past failures and a desire to atone, becoming almost as unbalanced as the suspects he pursues.

The more everyone delves into Mads’ psyche, the less clarity they find. Did this broken man really commit such monstrous acts? Or is he a victim of mental illness and past abuse, convinced by others that he is a killer? As no easy answers emerge, the investigator’s own fragilities threaten to shatter whatever truth remains buried in Mads’ troubled mind.

Troubled Souls

At the center of What Remains is Mads Lake, brought to haunting life by Gustaf Skarsgård. From the beginning, something seemed off about Mads. His mannerisms are meek and mousey as he struggles to piece his life back together outside the asylum walls. But beneath lies a history of unspeakable acts that still linger in Mads’ fractured mind. Skarsgård captures the character’s inner turmoil with unsettling authenticity. He imbues Mads with layers of vulnerability, depravity, and darkness in even his most benign moments.

Enter Anna Rudebeck, played compellingly by Andrea Riseborough. As Mads’ therapist, Anna forms a bond that seems to cross professional lines. She champions his cause with a fierceness that raises questions about her own demons. Riseborough infuses Anna with a steely empathy, but beneath hints at personal wounds guiding her mission to “save” Mads. The two become entangled in a complex relationship that blurs reality.

Meanwhile, Stellan Skarsgård is as stoic and steadfast as Detective Soren Rank. A former alcoholic, Soren now channels his inner turmoil into solving cold cases. But working with Mads stirs up memories of past failures that threaten his objectivity. Skarsgård imbues Soren with quiet dignity. Yet the role also allows him to peel back the character’s rigid facade to reveal the haunted man beneath.

Together, Gustaf, Riseborough, and Skarsgård craft deeply troubled protagonists wrestling with personal ghosts that overlap the case. Their nuanced performances are what lend humanity to these otherwise distressing characters and keep viewers invested in the film’s unsettling themes.

Messy Memories

What Remains takes on some profound themes that give it meaningful layers. At its core, it’s an exploration of memory—specifically, how blurry the past can be. Mads is plagued by fragmented recollections of horrific acts. But did they truly happen, or are they products of a fractured mind? The film poses this question in an unsettling way, letting viewers infer answers rather than spelling them out.

Trauma from the past also weighs heavily. Mads endured severe abuse as a boy, warping his development. The film hints that this trauma may have reality-distorting effects. It also shows how pain is passed down, as Mads’ abuser faced his own demons. What Remains underscores how deep wounds can resurface in later life in destructive ways.

A running thread is the quest for inner peace. Mads, Anna, and Soren all seem lost, clinging to this case to find resolution or redemption. Mads wants absolution, while the others use work as an anchor. But the film suggests healing is elusive. Answers remain beyond the characters’ reach, leaving past and present pain unresolved.

What Remains tackles its thorny subjects with empathy, avoiding easy conclusions. It shows how damage breeds damage and how memories can mislead. Above all, it demonstrates how the desire for clarity may be doomed when reckoning with deep wounds and unknowable pasts. Its messy exploration of these profound themes gives the film emotional heft and leaves viewers with much to ponder.

Dire Direction Dampens a Dark Story

Ran Huang crafted an intriguing premise with What Remains, yet his style does the story a few favors. From drab visuals to a plodding pace, certain choices drain tension instead of building it.

The film could’ve benefited from bolder colors and lighting. Too often, scenes feel muted and murky, lacking pop to grip eyes. Harsher contrasts may have intensified unsettling moods. As is, photography presents more doldrums than drama.

Locations also lack luster—a missed chance. Setting in historic Turku primes uniqueness but gets short shrift. Bare exteriors show scant character. Interiors fare a little better—utilitarian over atmospheric. We see a place, not feel its personality permeating the plot.

Pacing proves another issue. Extended dialogue, while allowing performance emotion, loses momentum. Points emerge diluted rather than delivered with impact. Trims could’ve trimmed fat for tauter tells. Subplots start yet stagnate, hints of intrigue handled haphazardly.

This tale thrives on tension, yet direction drains it. Scenes linger when suspense begs, propelling the narrative. Shock arrives diluted rather than delivered. Curious viewers find themselves curious about how long remains rather than gripped to discover what.

Talents like Skarsgårds breathe life where production falters. But visual verve and a taut touch could’ve elevated their excellent efforts. Instead, dreary design does dark deeds little justice, dimming a disturbing story that deserved maximum menace. Potential stayed promising due only to its players’ power, not the picture’s popping prowess. Perhaps another’s approach may have achieved the artistic apex this ambitious material merited.

Excellent Efforts Among Expected Expectations

The acting in What Remains carries a heavy load yet delivers strong work given the material. Gustaf Skarsgård takes on quite a challenge portraying Mads Lake, a troubled and disturbing figure. He navigates complex nuances with care, ensuring empathy amid unease. His internal conflicts seem raw and real.

Stellan Skarsgård embraces detective Søren Rank fully, though the part leaves much to be desired. A companion tortured by his own past, Søren remains a conundrum, yet Stellan finds humanity. Despite a character lacking depth or dynamism, he commits steadfastly. His skills keep viewers engaged where a lesser actor might fail.

Andrea Riseborough brings lived-in authenticity as Anna Rudebeck, a healer healing herself. Beyond superficial eccentricities, a heartbroken soul emerges credibly under her guidance. It is not an easy role, but she makes even its frustrations feel genuine.

Together, this trio drives the film forward through sheer prowess, preventing a complete disconnect from the dreary material. Their mastery enlivens weighty dialog and sterile environments alike. Focused intensity holds attention when little else draws it in.

That such talents manage involvement owes to their touch, not help from a script struggling to use them. But each stands by their commitments professionally and with care for difficult topics. Their efforts highlight what’s possible even within imperfect works. Among uncertainties, their performances remain bright spots lighting the way.

Questions Linger While Answers Remain Elusive

With an all-star cast and a thought-provoking premise, What Remains showed promise. Gustaf Skarsgård, Stellan Skarsgård, and Andrea Riseborough immerse themselves in complex characters, holding their view until the final scene. Their talents alone make it worth a look.

But other elements fail to deliver. The plot plods at a tiring pace, sapping suspense. Scant visual flair leaves much to the imagination. The minimal development of side stories started with teases rather than conclusions.

Most disappointingly, no answers arise to the questions posed. Ambiguity can intrigue us when a story grounds us enough first. Here, mystique only muddles and frustrates without resolution. Threads begin, yet none wrap up, leaving discussion threads hanging.

Potential exists but remains unfulfilled. Thoughts raised find no outlets. Psychology hinted at staying surface-level. Location fails to utilize the atmosphere possible. While acting engages, other aspects disengage rather than entertain.

For those seeking psychological mysteries, look elsewhere. Acting fans still find value, but the patience required won’t please all. Attempts at something compelling fall flat, transforming the intrigue anticipated into tedious watching instead. Questions linger longer than answers surface or thrills last, making challenges outweigh payoffs in the end for this film.

Also Read:

The Miracle Club Review: Faith, Forgiveness & Wasted Potential Detective Forst Review: Netflix’s Latest Brooding Detective Is A Cold Case of Wasted Potential The Future of “The Last of Us”: Season 3 Remains a Mystery Anticipation Builds for ‘The Expanse: A Telltale Series’ Reveal, but Release Date Remains a Mystery