In Sons, director Gustav Möller returns to the tense, confined settings that worked so effectively in his previous thriller The Guilty. This time, instead of an emergency call center, most of the action plays out within a Danish maximum security prison.
We follow Eva, a dedicated corrections officer portrayed compellingly by Sidse Babett Knudsen (Borgen, The Duke of Burgundy). Eva takes a maternal interest in rehabilitating the inmates under her care. But when a new prisoner named Mikkel arrives – the young man who murdered her son years earlier – Eva requests a dangerous transfer to his cell block to carry out an ethically questionable vendetta.
As Eva tests the limits of the system, endangering her job and her sanity, Möller develops a complex morality tale around the flawed institutions of criminal justice and personal accountability. Shooting in a disused real prison, he creates a chilling, claustrophobic atmosphere where the walls seem to close in on Eva as she descends further into obsession.
With Knudsen’s riveting central performance conveying suppressed rage, grief and regret, Möller invites us to understand, if not condone, Eva’s motivations. But he also asks difficult questions about the purpose of incarceration and the human capacity for rehabilitation or revenge. It’s a tense, ambiguous and unsettling drama that lingers in the mind.
Eva’s Haunting Turn
At the heart of Sons is Sidse Babett Knudsen’s riveting performance as Eva, the principled prison guard whose encounter with her son’s killer unlocks a darker side of her character. As the film opens, Knudsen embodies Eva as a caring, almost maternal presence trying to better the lives of her inmates through rehabilitation and education. Her positivity seems boundless.
Yet when Mikkel arrives, Knudsen masterfully conveys the turmoil broiling under Eva’s calm veneer. Though the details of her backstory remain appropriately sparse, we understand her lingering pain and need for retribution. As Knudsen’s expressions curdle from compassion to bitterness, we witness Eva’s principles crumbling.
Also Read
Once transferred to Mikkel’s high-security ward, Knudsen shows us a woman determined to use her position of authority to punish this young man who devastated her life. Through subtly vindictive actions, she asserts dominance in chilling ways while hiding behind a mask of professional duty. We see Eva testing the limits of power, and Knudsen makes this transition wholly believable.
Later, as the tables turn and Mikkel gains damaging leverage over Eva, Knudsen pivots to palpable desperation. Her superb acting sells Eva’s unraveling sanity as she compromises herself further trying to maintain control. Wielding only subtle gestures and haunted looks, Knudsen constructs a fully realized arc of a good woman driven to vengeful extremes. It’s a performance that lingers as a case study in human frailty.
“Delve into the heart of the British legal system with our The Jury: Murder Trial review. This gripping docudrama challenges the jury system by presenting the same case to two different groups, raising questions about justice and fairness. Experience the tension, deliberation, and ultimate verdicts that will make you question everything you thought you knew about the process of law.”
Exploring Justice Behind Bars
Sons makes apt use of its chilling real-life setting – a now-closed maximum security prison in Copenhagen – to explore difficult questions around crime and punishment. Shooting in the cramped halls and cells of this decaying correctional facility, Möller creates a fittingly oppressive atmosphere of confinement that mirrors the moral traps ensnaring the characters.
We witness Eva’s initial drive to rehabilitate prisoners through education and wellness programs – efforts society may view as “soft.” Yet the arrival of her son’s killer forces Eva to confront the contradictory punitive side of the system. Craving vengeance, she uses her position to torment Mikkel, raising provocative questions about the purpose of incarceration. Does society lock up criminals primarily for correction, isolation or retribution?
As Eva’s sanity unravels trying to redress this injustice she feels the system failed to resolve, Möller implicates both personal and institutional accountability. Yet he avoids giving viewers a comforting position of judgment. Instead, we’re left wrestling with the same uncertainty that haunts Eva: whether any soul is truly beyond salvation, or if enough goodwill and opportunity could redirect even someone who has caused so much harm.
Between the grim setting and Knudsen’s morally ambiguous turn as Eva, Sons creates an unsettling yet thoughtful exploration of justice – how we define it, how we seek it and the dangers when individuals try to shape it to their own ends within a system designed to be impartial. It’s a tense and philosophically restless drama that sticks with you.
Keeping Tension While Suspending Disbelief
As a psychological thriller designed to maintain a vise grip on viewers’ attention, Sons succeeds through sustained tension and a constantly shifting power dynamic between Eva and Mikkel. Möller crafts tight cat-and-mouse suspense without the usual action movie release valves, pairing claustrophobic camerawork with Knudsen’s simmers-to-a-boil performance.
We become invested in Eva’s crusade even as she makes questionable choices eroding her sanity, driven by the emotional truth of her grief and rage. Möller speeds the plot along, not giving us time to linger on discontinuities.
Yet for some audiences, these questionable leaps may strain believability over time. That Eva’s prison would fail to flag this conflict of interest and leave her alone with her son’s killer requires a suspension of disbelief. Her brazen torment of Mikkel without repercussions pushes the premise too far for some critics.
While these contrivances serve Möller’s aims, allowing him to stage an effective two-hander morality play, they may test viewers’ patience in what strives to be a gritty, verité-style thriller. Navigating what staff would realistically tolerate in the Danish penal system requires some mental maneuvering as Eva continues her unauthorized vendetta.
Nonetheless, Möller succeeds at crafting a pressure cooker of a viewing experience focused tightly on his complex central duo. For those able to accept its logical detours, Sons delivers as a tense, provocative revenge drama carried by Knudsen’s standout performance. But the film’s plausibility issues may hinder immersion for more practically-minded audiences.
Capturing Confinement
Visually, cinematographer Jasper J. Spanning makes apt use of a compressed 4:3 aspect ratio and shallow depth of field to reinforce the film’s themes of confinement and distorted perspective. Shooting in narrow hospital hallways, cramped cells and other static settings, Spanning’s camerawork fosters a closed-in, claustrophobic mood from the start.
As Eva becomes consumed with monitoring and manipulating Mikkel, we share her distorted point-of-view. Spanning frequently films Knudsen in off-center close ups, allowing the aggression in her expressions to fill the frame. Other characters are shot at a distance or fade into soft focus, underscoring her self-absorption.
This tight framing creates intimacy while hinting that much falls outside Eva’s blinkered pov. As she fixates on Mikkel, her judgment of what crosses ethical lines becomes as hazy to us as the backgrounds themselves.
Through this simplistic yet clever cinematography, Sons ensures the viewer feels as suffocatingly trapped as Eva in her desperation to achieve catharsis within the confines of an intractable system. We come to perceive the prison’s grim walls and the narrowly tunneled fixation of revenge as different manifestations of the same kind of confinement – external and emotional. It’s a deft visual style that puts us inside Eva’s darkness.
Signing Off with More Questions than Answers
Sons leaves viewers wrestling with the moral quandaries raised by Eva’s chilling turn in a story grounded in universal fears of injustice and helplessness. While its confined setting and tensely coiled plot make for gripping viewing, the film’s ultimate impact lies in the provocative philosophical questions it poses.
By the final scenes, Eva and Mikkel remain enigmas to us, guarding their emotions behind masks of revenge or apathy cultivated through years of dehumanizing treatment. Möller avoids tidy resolutions for these scarred souls, focusing instead on crafting dramatic intensity around their stand-off. We’re left to ponder whether either could have had their paths altered by more empathy and opportunity – or if darkness was their destiny.
While additional context around Eva and Mikkel’s lives might have enriched these questions, it risks dulling the knife’s edge intensity Möller ably sustains. Remaining inside the prison’s confines ensures the pressure cooker never releases as these two flawed people strip away civil convention to reveal the ugliness beneath.
Carried by Knudsen’s penetrating work, Sons plays out like a discomfiting thought exercise forcing viewers to assign blame amidst too many extenuating circumstances. It’s a bitter pill of a viewing experience likely to reward those seeking morally complex, emotionally exhausting drama over entertainment or inspiration. Leavingva vivid impression, Sons heralds a director pursuing difficult truths at all costs.
The Review
Sons
With Sidse Babett Knudsen commanding the screen as a principled guard undone by vengeance, Sons makes for tense, philosophically restless viewing. Those troubled by its logical gaps may disengage as Möller tightens his grip. But willing participants in his cold moral experiment will find a thriller as mentally unshakable as its grim setting.
PROS
- Sidse Babett Knudsen gives a standout, riveting lead performance
- Tense atmosphere and brisk pacing maintain an edge-of-seat viewing experience
- Thought-provoking themes related to justice, punishment, and rehabilitation
- Strong visual style using 4:3 aspect ratio and shallow focus heightens tension
- Complex moral dilemmas for the characters pose interesting philosophical questions
CONS
- Some logical gaps in the premise test believability
- Could have benefited from more context about the main characters' backstories
- The ending leaves many issues unresolved in an ambiguous way
