The new historical drama “Mary & George” on Sky Atlantic dares to pull back the velvet curtain on one of 17th century England’s most salacious royal scandals. Set during the reign of King James I, this provocative series chronicles the cunning schemes of Mary Villiers, a woman of modest nobility desperate to elevate her family’s status.
Her bold plan? To groom her dashing younger son George into becoming the object of King James’ desires, exploiting the monarch’s well-known penchant for keeping male favorites among his inner circle of courtiers. From its opening scenes, “Mary & George” establishes an edgy, transgressive tone seldom seen in period pieces.
Bawdy language, unflinching depictions of sexuality, and unrestrained debauchery pervade this adaptation of Benjamin Woolley’s non-fiction book “The King’s Assassin.” But beneath the show’s deliciously sordid trappings lies a gripping tale of ambition, court intrigue, and the inescapable bounds of class in Stuart-era Britain. Steered by Julianne Moore’s tour-de-force performance as the domineering Mary, this audacious drama dares to venture into uncharted territory for a historical saga.
Power Plays and Royal Seductions
At the center of “Mary & George” is the ambitious Mary Villiers, a cunning widow who will stop at nothing to secure her family’s standing among England’s noble elite. Barely clinging to financial solvency after her husband’s untimely death, Mary places her hopes on her younger son George—a strikingly handsome yet somewhat aimless young man. Recognizing George’s potential as a prime object of desire, the ruthless Mary concocts an audacious plan: to groom him into becoming the lover of the hedonistic King James I himself.
Mary sends George away to receive a decidedly unorthodox education in the ways of courtly life and seduction at the hands of French tutors. Meanwhile, she swiftly remarries a wealthier lord to elevate the family’s social rank. Upon George’s return, Mary begins a single-minded campaign to thrust him into the king’s orbit, even as George skeptically questions her motives.
Their path crosses with the king’s current favorite, Robert Carr, the Earl of Somerset, sparking a dangerous rivalry between the two young noblemen vying for James’ affections and patronage. As George’s star rises, sowing discord in the unstable court, other power players enter the fray—from the sharp-tongued Lady Hatton to the aging Sir Francis Bacon himself.
Beneath the show’s deliriously sordid spectacle of orgies and palace intrigues lie two central conflicts. First is Mary’s determination to transcend her lowly roots through the exploitation of her son, an obsession that descends into amorality. In parallel is George’s inner turmoil, pulled between his mother’s manipulations and his burgeoning self-actualization as an openly bisexual courtier of enormous influence.
With ribald twists at every turn, “Mary & George” transforms a juicy chapter of royal history into a deliciously sumptuous costume drama driven by ambition, lust, and the inescapable bounds of 17th century class and gender restrictions.
Cheeky Irreverence Meets Lavish Costume Drama
While outwardly adorned in the opulent finery of a prestige period piece, “Mary & George” delights in upending staid conventions from within. This daring series brings a brazenly modern, almost punk-rock ethos to its depiction of 17th century royal life—eschewing stifling aristocratic decorum in favor of deliciously vulgar irreverence.
The show’s contemporary sensibilities are immediately apparent through its cheekily anachronistic dialogue, peppered with modern profanities and sexual vulgarity that would make even hardened groundlings blush. “Is there any worse hell than a woman’s?” Mary sneers in one episode, capturing the show’s brashly cynical worldview.
This bawdy, tongue-in-cheek approach extends to the staging of court life itself. Lavish costumes and grandiose set pieces depicting royal debaucheries provide a sumptuous backdrop for the series’ deliriously over-the-top romps and couplings. One can’t help but titter at scenes of aristocratic orgies and drugged indulgences choreographed with almost slapstick relish.
Yet for all its self-aware raunchiness, “Mary & George” proves more than mere whimsy or camp spectacle. Beneath the bodice-ripping romps emerges sharp satire skewering the era’s oppressive class divides and hypocritical sexual mores. Mary’s obsessive scheming to elevate her family’s status represents a darkly comedic inversion of stuffy nobility—just as the king’s harem of male consorts satirizes unchecked patriarchal appetite.
With its heady alchemy of lavish period trappings, unabashed carnality, and cheeky postmodern attitude, “Mary & George” emerges as a true original—a daring, genre-blurring provocation dressed up in the finest royal garb.
Commanding Turns from a Powerhouse Ensemble
At the indomitable center of “Mary & George” is Julianne Moore’s tour-de-force portrayal of the cunning Lady Mary Villiers. Moore imbues the scheming protagonist with layers of complexity, rendering her as both monstrous and profoundly human. Her Mary exudes a fearsome intellect, wielding withering put-downs and manipulation like finely honed weapons. Yet Moore also locates shades of vulnerability – an aching desperation borne from the restrictions of her gender and class.
In Moore’s deft hands, Mary emerges as an antihero for the ages. One moment she is pure steel, coldly exploiting her son for self-preservation; the next she betrays fleeting tenderness as a mother torn by difficult choices. It’s a masterclass in moral ambiguity, dominated by a charismatic, mercurial performance that commands the screen.
Matched step-for-step is Nicholas Galitzine as Mary’s son George, thrust into a world of courtly seduction he never yearned for. Galitzine adroitly charts George’s evolution from an aimless, somewhat petulant youth into an increasingly self-possessed object of elite desire. The young actor captivatingly balances cocksure physicality with soulful vulnerability as George grapples with his role as his mother’s most prized pawn.
The twisted courtship between George and the hedonistic King James I forms one of the show’s most riveting dynamics. As the mercurial, id-driven monarch, Tony Curran imbues James with childlike impishness one moment and terrifying menace the next. Curran shines in conveying the king’s intoxicating aura and capricious whims, making for tantalizing verbal chess matches opposite the scheming Villiers clan.
Completing the ensemble is a murderers’ row of supporting players embodying the stratified power structure of Stuart England. Nicola Walker is scintillating as the sharp-tongued, socially superior Lady Hatton. And Mark O’Halloran brings wry gravitas to the aging Sir Francis Bacon as he mentors young George. Each performer enhances the series’ engrossing milieu of court intrigue.
Opulent Decadence with a Modern Flair
From its lush, ornate production design to the stylish camerawork, “Mary & George” revels in a lavish yet distinctly modern aesthetic. The shows’ art direction and costume teams have spared no expense in recreating the sumptuous decadence of 17th century court life through a gorgeously realized tapestry of richly textured fabrics, towering palatial sets, and meticulous period detailing.
This sumptuously mounted visual canvas is brought to vivid life through the series’ bold cinematic flourishes. Under the stylish directorial hand of Oliver Hermanus and others, the camera glides and swoops with energetic movement, employing striking angles and avant-garde lensing. One minute the visuals are steeped in shadowy, chiaroscuro atmosphere; the next, eye-catching pops of surreal imagery punctuate a gossipy courtly tableau.
Accentuating the audacious visuals is the show’s anachronistic soundtrack, blending stately classical compositions with jarring modern influences like throbbing electronic undercurrents. This musical dichotomy expertly personifies the series’ disruptive tonal blend of elegance and subversive irreverence.
With its seductive interplay of extravagant period trappings and boldly contemporary aesthetics, “Mary & George” crafts an intoxicating design palette befitting its morally murky tale of carnal ambition. This lavish production is a true feast for the senses.
Skewering the Patriarchy Through Carnal Machinations
Beneath its deliriously tawdry thrills, “Mary & George” operates as a searing social commentary that skewers the restrictive patriarchal power structures and oppressive class divides of 17th century English society. The drama’s central figures – the ruthlessly scheming Mary Villiers and her malleable son George – represent the marginalized have-nots of their era, clawing and seducing their way up the aristocratic ladder by any means necessary.
In this world, the pursuit of status and security is a zero-sum game fought through carnal manipulation and Machiavellian intrigue. As embodied by Julianne Moore’s terrifyingly incisive performance, Mary perceives her survival to be inextricably linked to the exploitation of her son’s beauty and sexual desirability. It’s a bleak, even monstrous portrayal of motherhood corrupted by crushing societal constraints.
George’s own arc doubles as both an examination of fluid sexuality and a metaphor for the era’s codified gender dynamics. His journey from callow uncertainty to emboldened self-actualization parallels a reclamation of personal identity in a society that would keep him marginalized and powerless. His royal dalliances with King James ironically grant him access to the inner sanctum of elite male privilege.
Overarching these individual trajectories is the series’ scathing portrayal of the corrosive effects of absolute power. The hedonistic court of King James emerges as a viper’s nest of debauched self-indulgence and vindictive jockeying for position amid fickle monarchical favor. One can’t help but read contemporary resonances in the show’s depiction of a ruling regime’s moral decay from within its lascivious inner circles.
For all its baroque pageantry and lascivious delights, “Mary & George” ultimately operates as a searing critique of systemic injustice, oppression, and the enduring human yearning to transcend one’s prescribed social standing through whatever means available – be they cunning, seduction, or outright violence. This is a period drama that deftly grounds its most outrageous provocations in a sobering real-world context.
Sumptuous Yet Uneven Royal Delights
For all its deliciously transgressive delights, “Mary & George” ultimately proves to be a flawed gem – a series that both dazzles and disappoints in equal measure. When firing on all cylinders, this lavish costume drama enchants with its intoxicating blend of visual opulence, biting social commentary, and performances of towering complexity from its elite ensemble.
Julianne Moore’s tour-de-force leading turn as the unapologetically monstrous yet compellingly human Mary Villiers is worth the price of admission alone. Her searing work, coupled with sterling support from the likes of Nicholas Galitzine and Tony Curran, elevates even the show’s most outlandish scenes of courtly debauchery and scheming.
Where the series stumbles is in maintaining its narrative momentum and distinctly edgy atmosphere over the course of its seven episodes. The bawdy irreverence and wickedly dark humor that initially define “Mary & George” gradually recede, giving way to a more conventional – if still enthralling – costume drama rhythm as it enters its second half.
Still, for those seeking a sumptuously mounted period saga with a wicked contemporary bite, “Mary & George” offers enough delectable thrills to sink one’s teeth into. This scintillating saga of naked ambition and bodice-ripping royal affairs may be tonally uneven, but its most electrifying moments cut straight to the contemporary core of enduring class struggles and oppressive social stratification. In its most transcendent moments, the series reminds us that for all their extravagant grandeur, the circles of power have always been soaked in the same sordid impulses – they’ve just been better concealed behind velvet robes and elegant furnishings.
The Review
Mary & George
While "Mary & George" loses some of its deliciously transgressive momentum in later episodes, this lavish and provocative historical saga still seduces with its sumptuous production values, performances of towering complexity, and delightfully anachronistic perspective on courtly decadence and societal oppression. It's a lusciously entertaining portrait of naked ambition that simultaneously revels in and subverts the traditional costume drama.
PROS
- Julianne Moore's magnetic, layered performance as Mary Villiers
- Gorgeous production design and cinematography
- Bold, provocative take on historical drama
- Scintillating exploration of power dynamics and gender politics
- Anachronistic modern sensibilities add fresh irreverence
- Captivating look at class struggles and oppression
CONS
- Loses some narrative momentum in later episodes
- Tonal shifts can feel uneven at times
- Vulgarity and sexual content may be excessive for some
- Lacks consistent depth in supporting characters
- Dark humor becomes less pronounced over time
