In post-revolution Russia, the landed gentry faced an existential threat from the rising Bolshevik regime. “A Gentleman in Moscow,” adapted from Amor Towles’ acclaimed 2016 novel, explores this tumultuous era through the unique lens of Count Alexander Rostov. Spared execution yet stripped of his privileges, Rostov is condemned to perpetual confinement within Moscow’s opulent Metropol Hotel.
What ensues is a decades-spanning tale of defiance, loss, and unexpected connection. At its center is Ewan McGregor, delivering a masterful performance brimming with roguish charm and profound depth. As the eponymous gentleman, McGregor imbues Rostov with an inextinguishable spirit that burns brightest when all seems lost. His sparkling chemistry with co-star Mary Elizabeth Winstead, who portrays the beguiling actress Anna Urbanova, blazes across the screen.
Yet for all its leading players’ accomplishments, “A Gentleman in Moscow” remains an uneven endeavor. Its pacing meanders like a contentious Moscow winter, stretching an intimate tale over an arguably gratuitous eight-episode span. Can the series’ admirable goals and heartening mankind ultimately outweigh its tendency to drift into inertia? This review aims to unlock that gilded cage.
The Confined Gentleman’s Journey
In the wake of the Russian Revolution, Count Alexander Rostov finds himself an aristocratic relic. Rather than facing execution, he is sentenced to an unusual punishment – permanent confinement within Moscow’s lavish Metropol Hotel. Stripped of his titles and assets, Rostov must trade his plush suite for a humble attic room, his new gilded cage.
What follows is a poignant exploration of one man’s struggle to maintain his identity and humanity in the face of oppressive circumstances. Over decades within the Metropol’s walls, Rostov forges a series of unlikely bonds that reshape his perspective.
A precocious young girl named Nina unlocks his parental instincts. His charged romance with the beguiling actress Anna Urbanova (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) ignites passion amidst the upheaval. Even the watchful state commissioner Osip Glebnikov (Johnny Harris) gradually sees Rostov as more than a relic.
These relationships, and others with hotel staff and regulars, buoy Rostov through Moscow’s turbulent transformation. As regimes rise and fall outside, the Count’s internal world evolves in profound ways. His commitment to civility and optimism is tested as he reckons with a changing nation that seems determined to leave his echelons behind. How this “gentleman” responds to such existential threats forms the compelling spine of the series.
A Master Class in Characterization
At the heart of “A Gentleman in Moscow” beats Ewan McGregor’s towering performance as Count Alexander Rostov. From his impeccably mustachioed appearance to his regal bearing, McGregor fully inhabits the dashing aristocrat. Yet he imbues Rostov with remarkable layers that transcend stereotypical aristocratic affectations.
In McGregor’s deft hands, Rostov is a finely etched study in contradictions – at once disarmingly charming and unflappably resilient. The Count adheres steadfastly to his gentlemanly code, yet displays relatable flaws and moments of fragility. McGregor adroitly balances Rostov’s refined elegance with a mischievous wit and defiant spark that make him irresistibly watchable.
The true artistry of the performance, however, lies in how Rostov’s inner world subtly metamorphoses across the decades. What begins as willful denial of his plight gives way to profound awakenings sparked by the relationships that blossom during his confinement. McGregor’s nuanced shift from haughty aloofness to hard-won humility is as naturalistic as it is affecting.
Complementing McGregor’s magnanimous turn is Mary Elizabeth Winstead as the radiant Anna Urbanova. In earlier episodes, Winstead enchants as the glamorous actress serving as Rostov’s taboo love interest. But as the series progresses, she unveils agile emotional depths. Anna’s allure evolves from mere beauty into a reservoir of depth and conviction, grounding the will-they-won’t-they sparks with profound soul.
The supporting ensemble shines just as brilliantly in orbiting McGregor and Winstead. As the principled Nina, Alexa Goodall possesses a precociousness never cloying. Fehinti Balogun’s Mishka exudes world-weariness behind his revolutionary bravado. And Johnny Harris’ Osip morphs from sneering antagonist into an unlikely friend, his grounded humanity seeping through icy officialdom.
Painting Russia’s Turmoil with Whimsical Strokes
While “A Gentleman in Moscow” centers on Count Rostov’s idiosyncratic predicament, it paints on a sprawling canvas – that of Russia’s traumatic rebirth in the 20th century. The Bolshevik Revolution’s seismic upheaval rumbles through every elegantly attired frame. Yet the series deftly avoids didactic lectures on ideology or becoming a blunt political polemic.
Instead, it renders the tumult of this era through an exquisitely personal lens. Rostov’s opulent surroundings at the lavish Metropol Hotel are a baroque affront to the destitution and oppression unfolding outside its doors. The Count’s imprisonment reflects how the ancien régime’s remnants were likewise caged and denied the freedom to simply exist.
Despite this grim subtext, “A Gentleman in Moscow” enchants through an alchemic blend of whimsy and poignancy. Its richly penned characters radiate irresistible idiosyncrasies and charm, even when navigating soul-crushing setbacks. Moments of drollery and delightfully quirky banter provide leavening accents amid the escalating dramatic stakes.
The series particularly shines when embracing a storybook-like sensibility to capture history’s vicissitudes. Episodes unspool with the captivating narrative verve of a fairy tale, replete with colorful figures and escapades lurking behind secret doorways. This fableesque tone renders even harrowing developments with a paradoxical sense of fortifying whimsy.
Yet “A Gentleman in Moscow” is no naïve lark – it wrestles with devastatingly real forces of dehumanization, loss of identity, and moral compromise. For every utopian Russian ideal espoused, scenes unveil how путинизм undermined and ultimately putrefied them. The superb production design encapsulates this tragic irony, watching the Metropol’s grandiose trappings gradually decay from ageless opulence into ravaged emblems of a dying dream.
Ultimately, however, the series is a paean to the resilience of human spirit against such hostilities. Count Rostov refuses to surrender his eternal optimism and dedication to cultured enlightenment, no matter how cruelly his nation attempts to extinguish them. His quiet defiance offers a masterclass in restoring dignity within unconscionable circumstances. Herein lies the aching profundity pulsing through “A Gentleman in Moscow’s” delicately rendered Tale.
Exquisite Craft Begets Transportive Splendor
While “A Gentleman in Moscow” owes its soul to the indelible performances, the series’ technical accomplishments are equally vital in transporting viewers. Director Ben Vanstone, along with episodic helmers Sam Miller and Sarah O’Gorman, wield an impeccable visual sensibility that imbues each elegant frame with cinematic richness.
The camera work is particularly spellbinding, deploying deliberate yet unintrusive flourishes to capture the opulence of the Metropol’s interiors. Ornate architectural details are covetously lingered upon, allowing the hotel’s stately grandeur to overwhelm the senses with each passing decade. When the lens finally exits those confines, the jarring austerity of Moscow’s wintry exteriors hits with visceral impact.
Such stark tonal contrasts are rendered all the more exquisite courtesy of the immaculate production design. The Metropol’s lavish furnishings and decor evolve organically as political regimes wax and wane, reflecting each era’s ideology through brilliant aesthetic choices. One can sense the crushing weight of history amassing like a intricately arranged still life.
Enveloping these ravishing visuals is the sublime original score. The composer’s fluttering, playful refrains underscore the whimsical human foibles afoot with elfin charm. But those melodies seamlessly metamorphose into aching melancholy during the more tragic character beats, enlightening every emotional undulation. Like the finest musical artists, the composer wields their sonic palette to elevate the storytelling with evocative, unobtrusive potency.
Through the cohesive brilliance of these technical disciplines, “A Gentleman in Moscow” transcends its televisual origins. The fabric of recreated history feels tangible and alive in a manner more akin to an arthouse cinema aesthetic than conventional episodic fare. It’s a masterwork of consummate craft in service of intoxicating sense of time and place.
Trapped in Its Own Opulence
For all its impeccable ingredients, “A Gentleman in Moscow” can’t quite escape the trappings of its central premise – being confined to the Metropol Hotel’s ritzy corridors. While Count Rostov’s universe may be expansive in emotional scope, the literal setting remains insularly claustrophobic over eight hour-long episodes. This structural impediment hinders the pacing’s propulsive momentum.
Too often, narrative detours and superfluous vignettes amble about aimlessly, losing the thread of dramatic tension. Entire chapters focusing on inconsequential trifles like a damaged painting or a comically over-engineered jailbreak feel like filibustering filler. Even pivotal narrative arcs, such as Rostov’s illicit romance with Anna or his unlikely friendship with commissioner Osip, can drift episodically despite their inherent intrigue.
This inertia is compounded by a reluctance to fully explore the roiling sociopolitical tumult unfolding beyond the Metropol’s walls. While Russia’s seismic ideological turmoil always looms as an omnipresent backdrop, “A Gentleman in Moscow” rarely engages substantively with the human toll and repressive mindsets symptomatic of Bolshevism’s rise. A few peripheral characters suffer brutal fates, but the series’ opulent insularity prevents fully reckoning with such ugliness.
Instead, the horrors of totalitarianism, censorship, and violence are largely muted or sidestepped in favor of the whimsy afforded by Rostov’s quixotic purview. His refusal to abandon principles of enlightenment in defiance of the new order carries undeniable emotional heft. However, the series’ reticence to confront darker national aftershocks head-on undercuts the richest dramatic potential of this allegory on the death of the ancien régime.
Does such criticism negate the myriad qualities that distinguish “A Gentleman in Moscow” as an enriching, finely crafted gem of historical world-building? Not entirely. Ewan McGregor’s towering performance alone imbues profundity into every interaction. The ornate production design and lush cinematography cast an immersive spell. And the blend of fizzy humor with wistful melancholy achieves exquisite tonal harmony.
Ultimately though, the series can’t quite transcend the longeurs resulting from its literal and thematic confines. Literary adaptations so often struggle to expand dense source material into prestige longform television. While “A Gentleman in Moscow” avoids outright perdition, it remains trapped, yearning for the expansiveness that true greatness requires.
An Elegant Etching of Life’s Paradoxes
For all its pacing lulls and insular limitations, “A Gentleman in Moscow” stands as a profoundly enriching viewing experience. This sumptuous adaptation of Amor Towles’ acclaimed novel captures the intricate paradoxes of human perseverance against historical upheaval.
Ewan McGregor’s masterful performance as the eternally optimistic yet unmistakably flawed Count Rostov is worthy of gracing the highest artistic pedestals. He imbues the confined aristocrat with such intoxicating shadings of wisdom, mirth and melancholy that the viewer can’t help but be enraptured. Supported by an exquisite ensemble and merging whimsical levity with searing poignancy, the series paints an indelible portrait of defiant dignity amid dehumanizing calamity.
While it may lack the sweeping dramatic propulsion of historical epics like “Chernobyl” or “The White Lotus,” its astute character work and ornate production values render “A Gentleman in Moscow” a masterwork of immersive, emotionally resonant storytelling. For appreciators of fabulism’s intersections with harsh realities, few series marry those sensibilities as adroitly.
For those willing to luxuriate in its measured cadences and revel in its paradoxical tones, this is a saga that, much like its protagonist, marvelously endures. Like the most superbly aged wine, “A Gentleman in Moscow” renders the bitter admixtures of life exquisitely palatable. It’s a vintage viewers will savor.
The Review
A Gentleman in Moscow
While "A Gentleman in Moscow" occasionally meanders and shies away from fully confronting the harsh political realities of its era, it remains an exquisitely crafted and emotionally resonant adaptation. Ewan McGregor's towering central performance, united with sumptuous production values and a deft balance of whimsy with melancholy, renders this a richly immersive exploration of human perseverance amidst historical upheaval. For those able to savor its deliberately paced delicacies, it's a transcendent vintage.
PROS
- Ewan McGregor's masterful, layered performance as Count Rostov
- Exquisite production design capturing different eras of 20th century Russia
- Thoughtful blend of whimsy and melancholy tones
- Supports an enriching, emotionally resonant exploration of the human spirit
- Visually cinematic with impeccable cinematography and scoring
- Engaging ensemble and depiction of absorbing relationships
CONS
- Pacing issues with lulls and lack of narrative propulsion at times
- Doesn't fully grapple with harsh political realities beyond the hotel
- Overly insular setting undermines sense of dramatic scope
- Superfluous filler plots disrupt storytelling momentum
- Doesn't transcend source material's constraints as much as it could
