Name: Apocalypse in the Tropics Review: Costa’s Illuminating Lens on Brazil’s Turbulent Times
Item: Apocalypse in the Tropics
Author: Shahrbanoo Golmohamadi

Brazilian documentarian Petra Costa takes us back into the tumult of her home country’s politics with Apocalypse in the Tropics, picking up key threads from her acclaimed previous film The Edge of Democracy. Five years have passed since that documentary offered a glimpse into Brazil’s shift towards a more conservative leadership. Now, Costa trains her perceptive lens on how matters of faith came to shape the nation’s turbulent affairs.

Specifically, she investigates the growth of evangelical Christianity over the past few decades and its connection to Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency. We learn that over just four decades, evangelicals ballooned from a small fraction to nearly a third of the population. Their ascendancy coincided with larger trends of economic hardship and ideological ferment. Meanwhile, Costa raises critical questions about how certain preachers have wielded biblical interpretations to accelerate instability and stifle social change.

A key profile is Silas Malafaia, a televangelist who seemed to pull the strings of Bolsonaro and others. What does his flourishing ministry and fiery rhetoric say about faith’s intersection with power in modern Brazil? In what ways might America’s own divisions be reflected across the ocean? And how might religion’s rising stakes reverberate down the line for democracy. With rigorous research and compassionate storytelling, Costa sets out to explore these piercing issues through troubling yet auspicious times.

Shifting Spiritual Tides

To grasp why faith came to permeate political discourse in Brazil, we must rewind a few decades. Evangelical denominations transformed dramatically within the nation’s borders, rising from a tiny fraction to a clear majority over just 40 years. Their ascent coincided with tumultuous times that left many longing for purpose.

American preachers played a role too. Prosperous touring stars like Billy Graham drew huge outdoor crowds nationwide. However, their visits also aligned with Cold War priorities in Washington. As Catholicism embraced “Liberation Theology” empowering poor communities, the US opposed this leftward drift. They saw new opportunities in evangelicalism’s growing appeal instead.

Changes at society’s foundations helped drive religious restructuring. Military rule from the 1960s through 80s disrupted lives amid repression and economic crisis. Many turned to faith amid instability. At the same time, long-standing Catholic structures lost influence over a changing populace. Pentecostalism in particular rose quickly thanks to personable pastors, lively music and messages of miracles.

Meanwhile, vast inequality persisted. Vast slums encircled booming cities, yet assistance fell short. Spiritual fulfillment took precedence for those lacking earthly sustenance. Charismatic evangelical personalities offered comfort and meaning, welcoming outsiders with open arms. Their focus on individual piety and self-help echoed protestant missionizing worldwide. These currents helped diversify Brazil’s spiritual landscape on a grand scale, with impacts still unfolding.

Pulpits and Politics

A pivotal character emerging in Costa’s chronicle is Silas Malafaia. As one of Brazil’s most prominent Pentecostal pastors, his reach extends far from church pulpits. Founding a national television network ensured wide exposure for Malafaia’s fervent sermons. His flexing of spiritual muscle became tremendously political.

Costa reveals how the preacher grew intertwined with Jair Bolsonaro’s rise. From early on, Malafaia took up the populist firebrand’s cause. Having tapped evangelical frustration, Bolsonaro held appeal as a disruptor promising restoration. Yet Malafaia’s influence, the film implies, surpasses any figurehead. His authority and charisma positioned him as a powerful voice within Brazil’s changed religious landscape.

Central to Malafaia’s outlook appears a polarizing brand of scripture. Specifically, his appropriation of Revelation’s end-times battles depict adversaries not as fellow citizens, but enemies to be vanquished. Same-sex unions, secular media, pandemic health mandates – all converge as targets in his us-versus-them rhetoric. Costa subjects such selectively literal interpretations to scrutiny. How might prophesied conflict motivate earthly conflicts, and faithful partisans blind to the human costs?

The director grants Malafaia candid, if conscience-testing interviews. Through them, recurring themes emerge around divine authority superseding civic duties. Yet Costa maintains her investigative craft, contesting stances that jeopardize national harmony. Up next, she shifts to September speeches revisiting Jesus’ compassion – a lens that casts the televangelist’s politics in sobering light.

Windows and Mirrors

Petra Costa proves herself a deft documentarian once more. Her rapport enables impressively candid sitdowns, whether facing Lula with empathy or boldly questioning Malafaia. Hearing powerful voices firsthand enriches understanding complex issues.

The director’s perspective evolves too. Seeking to grasp faith’s draw, she studies scripture – an earnest attempt bridging divides. Biblical chapter titles and paintings act as both windows and mirrors, illuminating scriptural analysis yet invoking religious art’s interpretation.

However, a more balanced contextualization of Christianity’s diversity seems needed. While Assembly of God gains focus, what of less politicized denominations and those of different classes? A fuller discussion incorporating varied viewpoints could have deepened insights.

Yet where politicians take center stage, ordinary citizens appear more decoration than participant. Drone shots spectacularize protests while distancing ordinary lives. Just twice does shelinger with common folk,though their experiences shape events most intimately. A shift prioritizing everyday struggles over political theater may have balanced how democracy is portrayed.

Overall, Costa’s investigative talents and empathetic narration make Apocalypse a thoughtful, challenging work. But representing civic issues demands accounting for all affected, notjust most visible factions.With continued growth in inclusive, grounded storytelling, her future investigations could hit even deeper marks.

Weaving Past and Present

Petra Costa crafts Apocalypse in the Tropics with a keen sense of flow. Organized into six astutely-titled chapters, her documentary interlaces threads of faith, politics and history into a cohesive tapestry.

Scenes of past and present interact seamlessly. Archival footage casts Brazil’s mid-20th century hopes in sepia, then gives way to color as the country changes. We glimpse grand visions realized, only to witness equally grand unravelings. Meanwhile, dramatic imagery places us amid throngs demanding change, or mobs threatening to tear it down.

Skillful editing connects these scales. Aerial drone shots command our awe one moment, drawing back to glimpse intimate struggles the next. Threads emerging over decades wind together towards knotted conclusions in our own time. Chapter headers evoke scripture’s prophesies, and so too does Costa seem to foretell turmoil through luminous storytelling.

Her films flow invites reflection without feeling detached. Analytic passages probe deeper causes, not as digressions but complementary veins within the same rich material. Arguments intertwine organically from wealth of source and form.

By episode’s end, once disparate eras reflect one another’s light and shadow. We grasp societal seismic as personal turning points, all flowing from history into an unresolved present. In deft hands, Apocalypse brings clarity and compass to events swirling Brazil’s future.

Bible and Ballot

Several overriding themes emerge from Costa’s insightful documentary. One concerns how certain religious actors appropriate scripture for their political aims. By stressing Revelation’s prophecies as current events, they portray opponents as divine enemies to defeat.

How might this mindset impact Brazilian governance down the line, especially with evangelicals a steadfast voting bloc? Costa hints their influence extends past elections, as Malafaia seems to pull strings from behind presidential curtain. Democracies require separating sacred and civic duties – yet here those distinctions blur.

Costa also draws parallels with populist eras nearer home, where segments saw partisan value in certain faith-based stances. Her film serves as timely reminder that democratic stability relies on policy prioritizing all citizens’ welfare, not any single group – regardless how fervently they preach or polls.

Apocalypse leaves us pondering faith’s role in society and whether certain interpretations compatibility with pluralism. Its themes reverberate worldwide, as political divides arise where spiritual and ideological authority become conflated. If we wish to strengthen civic foundations, we must find ways strengthening separation between Bible and ballot.

Interpreting the Signs

After weaving such a rich, intricate tapestry throughout Apocalypse in the Tropics, Petra Costa can only leave us with more questions than answers. She has cast light on the period’s defining forces, and painted a vivid picture of Brazil’s societal schisms. But ultimate outcomes remain unclear.

As an investigative work, the documentary excels in presenting multifaceted phenomena to stimulate discussion. Costa speaks to audiences as thoughtful peers, not instructors. We absorb her insights and apply them as we see fit.

Some critics fault gaps in representing ordinary citizens beyond convenient props. Yet her unvarnished access to power brokers, artful storytelling, and reflective narration still result in a thought-provoking watch. Through it, Costa’s interpretive skills prove a talent worth following as tensions evolve.

The film’s continued resonance suggests deeper unraveling under socioeconomic pressures when faith and politics conflate. Its analysis holds caution for any society where democracy defenders relax into complacency. As signs multiply daily demanding interpretation, Apocalypse offers tools for deciphering where hope may yet endure.

The Review