The true-crime genre, a dominant and seemingly inexhaustible force in the streaming landscape, often finds comfort in repetition, cycling through the same infamous stories. Yet, in its new docuseries “Murder Has Two Faces,” ABC News Studios has weaponized that familiarity to create something deeply unsettling.
Hosted by veteran journalist Robin Roberts, whose presence lends a steady gravitas, the show operates on a deceptively simple premise. It takes a murder case that has been seared into the public consciousness through relentless media coverage and pairs it with a lesser-known case that is uncannily similar in its details, timeline, and geography.
Each episode presents a disturbing parallel. We see the disappearance of one pregnant woman in the San Francisco Bay Area mirrored by another just months apart; we watch as a high-profile killing in Washington D.C. political circles echoes a previous one that barely registered as a local news item. The series, however, refuses to present these stories as mere tragic coincidences.
It holds them up as exhibits A and B in a sharp, critical inquiry, actively posing a pointed and uncomfortable question that implicates the media, law enforcement, and the audience itself: What invisible metrics determined which victim became a household name and which one became a statistical footnote?
Calibrating Outrage
The series wastes no time in articulating its central, potent argument: the perceived value of a crime victim in America is often pre-calculated based on the intersecting calculus of race and socioeconomic class. “Murder Has Two Faces” is not the first program to touch on this, but its directness marks a significant shift for a mainstream network production.
The show gives a name to the selection process, a term that has circulated in academic and activist circles for years but is here laid bare for a wide audience: “missing white woman syndrome.” This is not treated as an abstract theory but as a concrete, functioning mechanism of the media machine, dictating whose story is deemed worthy of our collective grief.
Also Read
The premiere episode’s comparison of the Laci Peterson and Evelyn Hernandez cases provides a stark and powerful illustration. The national narrative surrounding Peterson, a middle-class white woman, immediately cast her as the ideal, innocent victim in need of protection and justice. For Evelyn Hernandez, a working-class Latina immigrant from El Salvador, the implicit subtext was one of risky choices and a life that didn’t fit the preferred, commercially viable victim template.
With surprising candor, the series features interviews with journalists like KABC-TV’s Lyanne Melendez, who reflect on their own newsrooms’ failures with a palpable sense of regret, acknowledging they simply did not advocate for Hernandez with the same relentless vigor. The show demonstrates how this disparity in coverage directly impacts police pressure and public engagement, creating two vastly different paths to justice.
A Triptych of Neglect
The show meticulously builds its case across a devastating triptych of comparisons, each one adding another layer to its indictment of systemic bias. The Hernandez/Peterson pairing is defined by its shocking parallels: both women were eight months pregnant with sons, both vanished from the Bay Area within months of each other, and both of their dismembered bodies were discovered later in the San Francisco Bay.
Yet their stories diverge sharply at the resolution. Scott Peterson was convicted for his wife’s murder in a trial that became a national obsession. Evelyn Hernandez’s case remains cold and unsolved, and her five-year-old son, Alex, who disappeared with her, is still officially a missing person—a second, silent tragedy buried under the weight of the first.
The second pairing, the cases of Joyce Chiang and Chandra Levy, shifts the focus to institutional response and the power of a family’s advocacy. Chiang, a 27-year-old Asian American attorney, disappeared in 1999. Her family had to actively fight a damaging police narrative, pushed publicly by a high-ranking official, that suggested her death was a probable suicide.
It was only after the Levy case exploded in the media two years later, with its own political intrigue, that renewed attention was forced upon Chiang’s investigation, compelling authorities to finally classify her death correctly as a homicide.
Finally, the series contrasts the “Craigslist Killer” (Philip Markoff) with the “Tagged Killer” (Khalil Wheeler-Weaver), revealing a chilling disparity in how law enforcement treats witnesses based on their perceived credibility.
Tiffany Taylor, a Black woman who survived a horrific attack by the “Tagged Killer,” provided police with his name, address, and other critical information. Her testimony was largely dismissed. Wheeler-Weaver was left free to kill again, a murder that might have been prevented. This inaction stands in sharp relief to the immediate, high-profile police action and public warnings issued in the Markoff case, where the victims fit a more “sympathetic” profile.
The Structure of Empathy
While the show’s thesis is deeply analytical, its storytelling method is rooted in humanization, a clear trend in more thoughtful true-crime productions seeking to counter the genre’s exploitative tendencies.
The production makes a deliberate and effective choice to de-center the famous cases—which it assumes the audience already knows—and instead builds its emotional world around the friends and families of the forgotten victims. We spend meaningful time with Evelyn Hernandez’s friends, who fought tirelessly to get her face on the news, and with Joyce Chiang’s brother, Roger, whose grief and frustration are still painfully sharp decades later.
Robin Roberts’s role is deployed with surgical precision. She is not a constant, disembodied narrator but appears for specific, empathetic one-on-one interviews that anchor the emotional core of each episode.
The effect is powerful, creating moments of profound connection, such as when the show plays Joyce Chiang’s cheerful voice from an old answering machine, or when Reverend Leroy West, the father of one victim, embraces a survivor of the same killer in a moment of shared healing. “Murder Has Two Faces” thus succeeds not by simply presenting facts, but by structurally engineering empathy, forcing a difficult and necessary look at whose lives are considered worthy of our collective attention.
Murder Has Two Faces is a three-episode true-crime documentary series hosted by Robin Roberts that premiered on May 6, 2025, exclusively on Hulu in the U.S. through ABC News Studios and Hulu/Disney bundles, with international rollout expected via Disney+.
Full Credits
Director: Lisa Cortés
Producers and Executive Producers: Lisa Cortés, Jon Sechrist, Tara Malone, Laura Michalchyshyn, Matthew Hornburg, Mark J. W. Bishop, Claire Weinraub, Katie Conway, David Sloan
Cast: Robin Roberts, Amara Cofer, Bobby Chacon, Lauren Ashburn
The Review
Murder Has Two Faces Season 1
"Murder Has Two Faces" is an essential piece of television. It elevates the true-crime format from a simple whodunit into a sharp social critique, forcing a necessary conversation about which victims our society chooses to value. By giving voice to the forgotten, the series is not just affecting; it's a powerful and impeccably executed indictment of systemic bias in media and law enforcement.
PROS
- An innovative and powerful premise that directly compares parallel cases.
- Employs a human-centered approach, giving dignity and voice to overlooked victims and their families.
- Well-researched, thoughtfully structured, and emotionally resonant.
CONS
- Its intense focus on social critique may not appeal to viewers seeking a traditional mystery-solving format.
- The three-episode season, while powerful, only scratches the surface of a deep and pervasive issue.
