The YRF Spy Universe has become a formidable institution in Indian cinema, and expectations for any new entry are exceptionally high. War 2 arrives carrying this weight, reintroducing the enigmatic agent Kabir Dhaliwal to the fold. The film immediately throws its hero into a new crisis.
Now a mercenary for hire, Kabir appears to have turned against his own country, prompting a desperate response from his former agency. India’s answer is to dispatch its own top operative, the duty-bound and relentless Major Vikram Chelapathi, to hunt him down.
What unfolds is a high-stakes chase across continents, built on the promise of a spectacular face-off between two of the nation’s biggest stars. The story sets a stage for a grand examination of loyalty, betrayal, and the thin line separating a patriot from a traitor.
A Plot Lost in Exposition
The narrative begins with a straightforward premise. Kabir’s apparent betrayal is cemented when he targets his own mentor, Colonel Luthra, while seemingly aligning with a shadowy terrorist organization known as Kali. This group is presented as a multinational cartel of anarchistic industrialists from across Asia, a modern foe driven by profit instead of ideology. The introduction of Vikram as the officer assigned to stop Kabir establishes a clear conflict between two equally skilled men. This simple setup, however, quickly unravels into a story loaded with so many twists and shifting allegiances that it becomes a chore to follow.
The plot’s primary mechanism for delivering crucial information is a heavy dependence on lengthy, sequential flashbacks. This storytelling choice consistently disrupts the momentum of the present-day action, pausing high-octane pursuits to fill in character history. A particularly jarring example is the extended second-half sequence that transports the audience to the slums of Mumbai to witness Kabir and Vikram’s childhood. While intended to build an emotional foundation for their bond, its placement feels awkward and its execution is generic, stopping the film dead in its tracks.
The deep connection between the two men, which is meant to be the story’s emotional anchor, is revealed entirely through this retroactive method instead of being developed organically. This robs their conflict of immediate emotional weight, as the audience is given the reasons to care long after the conflict has begun. This structural weakness is a common pitfall in mainstream Indian blockbusters, where complex backstories are often dumped via exposition rather than woven into the fabric of the narrative.
Also Read
The film’s nearly three-hour runtime is stretched to its breaking point by this approach. With several sequences staged like their own finales, the picture struggles to maintain a steady pace, creating a sense of narrative fatigue. It feels like watching multiple episodes of a series back-to-back, where each part has its own climax, ultimately diminishing the impact of the true ending. The central plot is simply too thin to justify its extensive length and elaborate, circuitous structure.
Stars in a Disconnected Orbit
Hrithik Roshan returns to the role of Kabir Dhaliwal with a familiar commanding presence. His physicality in the action sequences remains a highlight, presenting an idealized image of a super-spy who is both graceful and lethal. He embodies the slick, Westernized action hero archetype with effortless cool. The character’s emotional development, however, offers little that is new, staying within the stoic and infallible persona established in the first film.
His performance relies heavily on an established star persona, which serves the spectacle but limits the character’s humanity, making his supposed internal conflicts feel theoretical. Jr. NTR, in his Hindi-language debut, brings a ferocious intensity to Vikram. His performance is styled with a distinct flair rooted in the mass-oriented traditions of Telugu cinema, a deliberate cultural contrast to Kabir’s polish.
The cinematic language shifts when he is on screen; his entrances are punctuated by roaring sound effects, and his fighting style feels more raw. This choice to represent a North-South divide through cinematic style is interesting, but the script gives him a two-dimensional part that does not fully use his talents. He is more of a concept than a character.
The film’s central selling point, the on-screen dynamic between the two stars, never quite materializes. The intended frenemy chemistry, laced with suggestions of homoerotic tension, feels forced and distant. In scenes designed to show their bond, such as a “Predator”-style arm clasp, they stare off into the distance as if unaware of each other’s presence.
The much-anticipated dance sequence feels more like two superstars performing separate routines for the camera than two characters interacting. In many scenes, the actors appear disconnected, performing in isolation rather than building a shared energy. This lack of a believable bond weakens the entire film.
The supporting cast is similarly underserved. Kiara Advani’s Kavya, a decorated wing commander with a personal connection to the story, is given very little to do. Her character is quickly reduced from a capable officer to an ex-flame and a pawn in the plot. Despite her father’s murder being a key event, she is denied any meaningful catharsis, functioning as a plot device instead of a participant.
The Digital Sheen of Global Action
Director Ayan Mukerji constructs War 2 on an ambitious global scale. The film hops between exotic international locations, from a snowy samurai battle in Japan, complete with expressive wolves, to a high-speed pursuit involving a train and a car in Europe. These elaborate set pieces are imagined with flair, aiming for the kind of physics-defying spectacle seen in global franchises.
The execution, however, leans heavily on CGI and green screens, a choice that contrasts sharply with the practical stunt work seen in series like Mission: Impossible. This digital polish creates a palpable sense of artificiality that permeates every action beat. Stunts feel weightless and detached from any real-world danger.
A fight on the exterior of an airplane or a boat landing on a racetrack looks visually inventive but lacks the grit and tension of practical effects. This “green-screen syndrome” affects the performers, whose faces remain perfectly composed even in moments of extreme peril. The lack of visible physical strain or the effect of gravity breaks the audience’s suspension of disbelief, making the action resemble a video game cutscene.
Coming from a background in romantic dramas and VFX-heavy fantasy, Mukerji struggles to find the right tone for a spy thriller. He brings his Brahmastra sensibility, a focus on digital spectacle and mythological grandeur, to a genre that often benefits from a grittier, more tactile approach. His direction prioritizes this grand visual scale, but his focus on grandeur appears to come at the expense of coherent storytelling.
The editing during these key moments is frequently chaotic, using rapid cuts that obscure the action rather than clarify it. It is often difficult to follow the geography of a fight or a chase, which lessens its impact and leaves the viewer feeling disoriented. The result is a film that looks expensive and expansive but feels strangely inert and unengaging.
A Hollow Victory for the Franchise
The defining quality of War 2 is the gap between its technical polish and its narrative shortcomings. The film’s slick action choreography, impressive visual concepts, and immense star power are its clearest strengths, delivering moments of pure cinematic grandeur.
It is a masterclass in technical assembly, from its sound design to its visual effects coordination. This is countered by a weak, convoluted script that fails to provide the genuine emotional stakes needed for the spectacle to matter. It is a beautiful machine with no engine. As an addition to the YRF Spy Universe, the film feels like a potential misstep. It does not successfully expand the world in a meaningful way.
While predecessors like Pathaan and the Tiger films balanced their action with themes of cross-border unity and questioned simplistic patriotism, War 2 reverts to a less thoughtful sentiment. This thematic regression suggests the franchise may be losing its ideological edge in its pursuit of ever-larger spectacle. While entertaining in short bursts as a distant display of style, the viewing experience is ultimately a hollow one, struggling to leave a lasting impression because of its underdeveloped story and characters.
Full Credits
Director: Ayan Mukerji
Writers: Shridhar Raghavan, Abbas Tyrewala
Producers and Executive Producers: Aditya Chopra, Sanjay Shivalkar, Rishabh Chopra
Cast: Hrithik Roshan, N. T. Rama Rao Jr., Kiara Advani, Ashutosh Rana, Anil Kapoor, Varun Badola, Arista Mehta, K. C. Shankar, Reshma Bombaywala, Vijay Vikram Singh, Karan Kishore, Imroz Maur, Anupam Bhattacharya, Dumani, Benedict Garett, Hardip Dhupia, Ajit Koshy, Hidayat Sami, Cesar Raton, Nelson Liao, Madhuri, Hemant Mahuar, Kwon Soon Young, Soni Razdan, Tiger Shroff, Vaani Kapoor, Bobby Deol
Director of Photography (Cinematographer): Benjamin Jasper
Editors: Aarif Sheikh
Composers: Sanchit Balhara, Ankit Balhara, Pritam Chakraborty
The Review
War 2
War 2 delivers a dazzling display of globe-trotting action and star power, with technically polished set pieces that aim for world-class spectacle. However, this visual grandeur is built upon the foundation of a convoluted, lifeless script. The central relationship between its two leads fails to ignite, and the story’s reliance on clumsy exposition over organic development leaves the nearly three-hour experience feeling both overstuffed and empty. It is a loud, expensive, and handsome production that offers fleeting thrills but lacks a narrative heart, making it a frustratingly hollow addition to its cinematic universe.
PROS
- Commanding screen presence of its two lead stars.
- Ambitious, large-scale action concepts set in diverse global locations.
- High production value with polished cinematography and technical execution.
- An interesting, if underdeveloped, stylistic contrast between the two main characters.
CONS
- An overly convoluted and thin script that struggles to justify its runtime.
- Heavy reliance on flashbacks that disrupt the narrative flow and pacing.
- A clear lack of genuine on-screen chemistry between the lead actors.
- Excessive runtime leads to narrative fatigue and multiple false climaxes.
- Action sequences feel artificial and weightless due to an over-reliance on CGI.
- Poorly developed supporting characters, especially a sidelined female lead.
