A federal judge has allowed a $170 million defamation lawsuit against Netflix to move ahead regarding their hit series “Baby Reindeer.” U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner denied Netflix’s attempt to dismiss the case filed by Fiona Harvey. Harvey claims the show falsely portrayed her through a character named Martha.
The court found that a reasonable person could connect the Martha character to Harvey based on several similarities. Both worked as Scottish lawyers living in London. Their ages also matched details about the show’s creator Richard Gadd. Specifically, the series depicted Martha as being convicted twice for stalking, which Harvey says is untrue.
While Netflix argued Harvey’s reputation was already damaged, the judge ruled the portrayal could still be considered defamatory. Key evidence that may complicate Netflix’s defense came to light as well. The company had acknowledged to UK Parliament that Harvey was indeed never convicted of stalking. This contradicts what the show presented.
The judge dismissed some claims like negligence but allowed the case to proceed on defamation and emotional damage. A trial is scheduled for May 2025. This legal challenge comes as “Baby Reindeer” finds success, though it raises concerns about truthful depictions in shows labeled as “based on a true story.”
As the dispute moves forward, the outcome could impact how streaming services develop such programming going forward. Both sides have been asked to consider settling instead of a public trial, where Netflix may face challenges defending their position.
