![Kingdom Hearts Collection [I-III] Review](https://gazettely.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Kingdom-Hearts-Collection-I-III-1-360x180.webp "Kingdom Hearts Collection [I-III] Review: KHII Holds Steady as Newer Entries Fluctuate 40")
The British prison in Wasteman is not a stage for hardened archetypes; it is a functioning ecosystem of despair. Director Cal McMau sidesteps genre clichés to present an institution defined by its oppressive atmosphere and the quiet desperation of its inhabitants. Here we meet Taylor, played by David Jonsson, a man whose slumped posture and regret-filled eyes signal a desire to simply fade into the concrete walls. His existence is a careful negotiation for invisibility.
The possibility of early parole, granted not for good behavior but due to systemic overcrowding, hangs like a fragile lifeline. This chance to reconnect with a son he barely knows gives him a sliver of hope in a world where survival depends on staying unnoticed. His vulnerability is underscored by a reliance on opioids, a currency in the prison’s thriving internal economy and a balm for his deep-seated pain. Taylor’s story begins not with a bang, but with the quiet, desperate prayer of a man with everything to lose.
An Ecology of Domination
Taylor’s carefully managed anonymity is shattered by the arrival of his new cellmate, Dee. Portrayed by Tom Blyth, Dee is a force of pure disruption, an embodiment of aggressive ambition that immediately alters the prison’s delicate social balance. He is loud, charismatic, and operates with a predator’s instinct for weakness.
His takeover of their shared space is a symbolic act of colonization; he replaces Taylor’s meager television with a flatscreen equipped for video games and fills every corner with his designer tracksuits and protein bars, importing a consumerist bravado into the stark reality of incarceration. Dee quickly identifies Taylor’s docile nature as a resource, manipulating him into serving as an unwilling asset for his burgeoning drug enterprise.
Their dynamic evolves into a complex form of parasitic symbiosis, a theme that transcends the prison genre and speaks to broader social power structures. Dee’s manipulation is sophisticated, often cloaked in the language of friendship and protection. He offers Taylor a shield from other inmates and even helps him connect with his son, blurring the lines of exploitation so effectively that his control almost feels like camaraderie.
For Taylor, isolated and beaten down, Dee’s vitality is a perverse source of attraction. This toxic bond becomes the film’s central conflict, a microcosm of how aggressive personalities can prey upon the vulnerable by offering a distorted version of security. Taylor is forced out of the shadows, confronting the very violence and political maneuvering that threaten to extinguish his fragile hope for freedom.
The Aesthetics of Chaos
Cal McMau injects the grim setting with a frenetic, sensory-driven energy that aligns its visual language with a globalized, media-saturated culture. The film’s direction transforms the prison from a static location into a volatile space that feels like a chaotic, drug-fueled rave, pulsing with a life of its own.
This vision is realized through Lorenzo Levrini’s distinctive cinematography, which employs a dual visual strategy. On one hand, there are meticulously composed shots, bathed in cool, somber lighting that reflect Taylor’s internal state of loneliness and regret. These moments possess a classical cinematic quality. On the other, the film incorporates raw, vertical footage from smuggled cell phones, capturing the brutal reality of prison fights and impromptu parties.
This choice is more than a stylistic flourish; it acknowledges that even in a closed institution, life is performed, recorded, and mediated by technology. It mirrors the language of social media, suggesting a universal human impulse to document and broadcast one’s existence, even in the most desperate circumstances.
The shaky camerawork during violent altercations generates a palpable sense of chaos, immersing the viewer directly in the brutality. This approach, while effective at creating immediacy, occasionally obscures the action it seeks to critique, a contradiction that reflects the messy nature of violence itself.
The entire experience is amplified by a bass-heavy, pulsating soundtrack that functions as a narrative force, driving the film’s rhythm and signaling Taylor’s descent. The music makes the claustrophobic environment feel both threatening and strangely hypnotic, creating a potent juxtaposition of confinement and hedonistic release.
A Dueling Portrait of Masculinity
The film rests on the formidable performances of its two leads, who present conflicting models of modern masculinity under extreme pressure. David Jonsson gives a profoundly internal performance as Taylor, conveying a lifetime of regret and quiet suffering through his physicality. His slumped shoulders and averted gaze tell a story of defeat long before any dialogue is spoken.
Jonsson’s work is a masterful study in repression, showing how for some men, survival has long meant self-effacement. This kind of non-verbal storytelling translates powerfully across cultural divides, grounding the film’s high-energy style in a recognizable human struggle. In sharp contrast, Tom Blyth infuses Dee with a magnetic and dangerous energy.
He weaponizes his natural charm to create a character who is both appealing and deeply sociopathic. Blyth embodies a performative, aggressive form of manhood, one built on external displays of dominance and psychological control. His charisma is not a mask for his villainy; it is the primary tool of it, making him a seductive figure even as he enacts his cruelty.
The chemistry between the two actors is electric. Their opposing energies, Jonsson’s coiled stillness against Blyth’s explosive extroversion, create a compelling dynamic that anchors the film’s ambitions. Their relationship is a complex dance of power, need, and betrayal. Jonsson and Blyth ensure this abstract conflict feels intensely personal and real, elevating the narrative from a simple prison drama into a potent examination of two broken men.
Wasteman is a film that premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 6, 2025. It is a prison thriller that stars David Jonsson as a mild-mannered inmate and Tom Blyth as his charismatic but menacing new cellmate. The movie is distributed by Lionsgate.
Full Credits
Director: Cal McMau
Writers: Hunter Andrews, Eoin Doran
Producers: Sophia Gibber, Myles Payne, Philip Barantini, Samantha Beddoe
Editors: James A. Demetriou
Cast: Tom Blyth as Dee, David Jonsson as Taylor, Alex Hassell, Neil Linpow, and Corin Silva. The review from Roger Ebert mentions Guy Pearce, Cosmo Jarvis, and Vincent Miller, so I will add them to the cast list to make it more complete.
The Review
Wasteman
Wasteman elevates a familiar prison narrative through Cal McMau's ferocious, sensory-driven direction. While the story's path may feel predictable, the journey is made electric by the phenomenal, dueling performances of David Jonsson and Tom Blyth. Their complex dynamic transforms the film from a simple genre piece into a potent and visceral examination of masculinity and survival in a world designed to break the human spirit. It is a stylish, brutal, and deeply felt piece of filmmaking.
PROS
- Outstanding and contrasting lead performances from David Jonsson and Tom Blyth.
- Visually dynamic and energetic direction that creates an intense atmosphere.
- Effective use of sound and music to build a sense of chaos and dread.
- Deeply explores the complex, toxic relationship at the film's core.
CONS
- The plot follows a relatively conventional prison-drama trajectory.
- The blend of composed cinematography and raw phone footage may feel disjointed to some.
- Intense shaky-cam visuals during fight scenes can obscure the choreography.
