![Kingdom Hearts Collection [I-III] Review](https://gazettely.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Kingdom-Hearts-Collection-I-III-1-360x180.webp "Kingdom Hearts Collection [I-III] Review: KHII Holds Steady as Newer Entries Fluctuate 37")
The quiet corridors of suburban schooling can hide a particular species of desperation, the kind that wears sensible shoes and smiles at faculty meetings. Doug Leibovitz lives inside that pressure cooker. He teaches middle school drama, while his private compass still points toward a Manhattan playwriting life that never arrived. The disappointment has hardened into something sharp. It turns openly caustic once he learns his former partner, Abigail, is now with Principal Brady.
Brady reads like the film’s designated “hollow man,” a bureaucrat who treats the school as a ladder: career advancement first, optics second, and that state “Blue Ribbon” award as the shiny proof of moral cleanliness. Doug decides the clean surface deserves vandalism. His chosen method is precise and ugly. He swaps the safe, state-approved production of “West Side Story” for a secret, grotesque musical about the September 11 attacks.
Doug’s move carries no hint of artistic rebirth. It plays as a calculated act of cultural sabotage, a deployment of “spite-logic” that drafts children as infantry in a private war. The film offers a jaundiced view of heartbreak scaled up into institutional chaos. Doug treats his job’s professional limits as props to kick aside. He remakes himself as a “martyr-architect” of disaster, convinced his rebellion carries moral weight. The students, who look to him for guidance, absorb the shrapnel of his self-mythology.
The Architecture of the Ego
Will Brill delivers a performance with remarkable, unwavering density. His Doug runs on narcissism that stays fixed in place, with no friendly concessions to the genre’s usual redemption machinery. The energy is frantic and poison-tipped, an embodiment of intellectual arrogance that refuses to soften even as the world around him starts to fray. Brill captures the high-frequency hum of a man convinced he is too large for the room. (This can be filed under “aggrieved-intellectualism,” a condition marked by wounded pride and a vocabulary that never stops auditioning.)
Rob Lowe plays Principal Brady with a polished corporate sheen, the kind that makes every hallway interaction feel like a networking event. His kindness registers as strategy, each gesture designed to keep the surface frictionless. Brady resembles a familiar type from Lowe’s repertoire, and that familiarity works here. It gives the character an unctuous edge, the smile of someone who can turn policy language into a shield. Doug’s hatred starts to look less like a random tantrum and more like a reaction to a very specific species of institutional charm.
Gillian Jacobs serves as the essential foil in this triangle of fragile male egos. As Abigail, she embodies the normal life Doug abandoned for his “revenge-play.” The script often keeps her in a reactive posture, and Jacobs still finds room to expose the absurdity of the men battling over her like she is a prize ribbon stapled to a bulletin board.
The film’s real pulse comes from the students. The ensemble brings an alert, lived-in sincerity that makes the adult maneuvering feel even smaller. Melanie Herrera, in particular, offers genuine warmth, and that warmth presses against Doug’s cold, utilitarian view of his cast. These kids treat theater as something earnest. Their commitment makes the approaching “9/11 pageant” land with extra force. Their honest effort collides with Doug’s cynical manipulation, and the collision produces the film’s most uncomfortable laughs.
The Currency of Resentment
This movie operates as a rigorous study of male resentment and its mechanics. Doug is the “failed-artist-as-villain,” a figure who experiences his suburban teaching post as a cosmic insult. Resentment fuels the narrative’s engine. It powers his decisions, colors his dialogue, and supplies the momentum that logic never could.
The satire bites hardest in its depiction of modern academic politics. Diversity initiatives appear in performative form, reduced to bureaucratic checkboxes that signal virtue while avoiding risk. Brady’s brand of political correctness functions as personal armor. He treats “tokenism” as a protective coating, and the coating keeps his climb toward the “Blue Ribbon” shiny and uninterrupted.
That atmosphere produces a “moral-vacuum” where Doug’s spite can thrive. The film frames suburban education as a site of petty obsession and careerist maneuvering, a place where adult insecurities find institutional cover. Doug shows no recognizable growth. He offers no late-stage epiphany, no moment of clarity that repairs what he has done. He holds steady as a “middle-school Mephistopheles,” committed to destruction through the final stretch.
I admire the script’s refusal to rescue him. A small part of me also wants the film to throw him a rope, then remembers that the rope would be part of the fantasy Doug already tells himself. The choice reads as bold and analytical. It suggests certain kinds of bitterness behave like structure, built into a person’s self-concept and reinforced by the systems around them.
The audience ends up watching a man willing to burn down an institution rather than accept his own mediocrity. The film frames that impulse as culturally familiar: the loudest grievance becomes the steering wheel, and the group gets dragged wherever the wheel-holder feels like going.
The Spectacle of the Profane
Giselle Bonilla directs with visual punchiness that keeps the premise from going slack. Rapid editing and Mateo Nossa’s percussive, stormy score create a constant sense of gathering doom, as if the movie can hear the audience bracing itself.
The final production, titled “Heroes,” plays like a masterclass in the “cringe-sublime.” Middle schoolers reenact the collapse of the towers while dressed as figures like Rudy Giuliani and George W. Bush. The image resists tidy comedic categories. The film leans into “too-soon” humor delivered by a generation with no lived memory of the event, and that gap creates an eerie, disconnected atmosphere. The point sits in the absurdity. The pageant becomes a visual model of historical trauma flattened into school-sanctioned performance, all in service of one person’s private grudge.
Bonilla handles this “tonal-havoc” with surprising control. The use of kitsch new-age classics like “Return to Innocence” during classroom bedlam lands as a biting comment on how tragedy gets packaged for consumption, softened into something easy to play over chaos.
The musical numbers function as excerpts from a larger catastrophe, executed with enough technical precision to sharpen the comedy. One image lingers: a child in oversized prosthetic ears, singing about structural integrity. It sticks because it feels both meticulously staged and morally deranged, the kind of moment that makes you laugh and then wonder what that says about you.
Bonilla keeps hold of the story while pushing extreme satire right up to the edge. The finale becomes a “gleeful-demolition” of the world the film built. The audience is left sitting with the wreckage, watching how far a single bitter person can derail a community through the sheer force of disappointment.
The Musical had its world premiere at the 2026 Sundance Film Festival on January 25. It screened in the U.S. Dramatic Competition category as part of the festival’s final year in Park City. Currently, the film is seeking a theatrical or streaming distributor for a wider release. During the festival, it was available for in-person screenings and select online viewing for ticket holders. You can expect news about its streaming or theater availability later this year as distribution deals are finalized.
Full Credits
Title: The Musical
Distributor: Seeking Distribution
Release date: January 25, 2026
Running time: 87 minutes
Director: Giselle Bonilla
Writers: Alexander Heller
Producers and Executive Producers: Rob Lowe, Greg Lauritano, Alexander Heller, Findlay Brown, Jordan Backhus, Gillian Bohrer, Jonathan Levine, Chris Quintos Cathcart, Tyler Boehm, Giselle Bonilla, David Duque-Estrada, Sean Calvano, Vince Jolivette, Jiarui Guo, Dan Reardon, Kyle Fox
Cast: Will Brill, Gillian Jacobs, Rob Lowe, Melanie Herrera, Michael Strassner, Cayden Romero, Nevada Jose, Aidyn James Ahn, Hannes Schaller
Director of Photography (Cinematographer): Tu Do
Editors: Chris Chandler, Devin Dulany
Composer: Mateo Nossa
The Review
The Musical
The Musical serves as a jaundiced, razor-sharp exploration of the "cringe-sublime," where personal spite is elevated to a high-stakes performance. It is a work that refuses the comfort of a moral arc, choosing instead to revel in the wreckage caused by the male ego. While the tone occasionally wobbles between satire and sincerity, the sheer audacity of its "too-soon" finale ensures it remains a memorable, if acidic, debut. It is a gleeful demolition of suburban pretense.
PROS
- A masterclass in static, "poison-tipped" narcissism that avoids the clichés of redemption.
- The 9/11 musical "Heroes" is a triumph of the grotesque, offering a visual punchiness that is genuinely funny.
- An incisive look at "aggrieved-intellectualism" and the performative nature of academic bureaucracy.
- The students provide a necessary warmth and earnestness that heightens the absurdity of the adult conflict.
CONS
- The film occasionally shifts between deadpan understatement and shrill amplification, creating moments of "tonal-havoc."
- Gillian Jacobs is relegated to a reactive role, leaving her immense comedic range somewhat untapped.
- Some segments feel slightly overstretched, particularly the buildup to the final performance.
