The newest series from Wolf Entertainment, “On Call,” takes us into the rough world of the Long Beach Police Department. This series is marketed as a “next-generation procedural” and was created by Elliot Wolf and Tim Walsh, with Dick Wolf serving as executive producer. What does that mean, though?
“On Call” uses a half-hour episodic structure, a nod to traditional television, to capture the fast-paced nature of modern policing. The shocking murder of Officer Maria Delgado at the beginning is meant to make people feel sorry for the killer and build tension. But the series has trouble making sense of itself; it jumps around awkwardly between episodic adventures and a main plot that feels more like a patchwork than a weave.
The characters, like Harmony, the stern officer, and Diaz, the wide-eyed rookie, are straight out of a screenwriting handbook. Although this dynamic is well-known, it doesn’t have the charm of old buddy cop films. The show sometimes touches on deeper issues of accountability and openness, but it usually stays away from them.
“On Call” risks reinforcing problematic narratives in its attempt at social criticism. Viewers are left wondering what, if anything, it says about the complexities of modern policing, even though it may entertain.
Structure and Format: The Tension of “On Call”
Regarding narrative depth, “On Call’s” half-hour structure presents an interesting challenge. On the one hand, it gives a quick, exciting look into the crazy world of policing, which seems to be made to fit the short attention spans of modern viewers. But this shortness often means giving up depth.
Each show is full of events ranging from fights between family members to fights between gang members, but they all feel a little too surface-level, like a cop who says they’re just “doing their job” without facing the moral dilemma that comes with it.
This blend of episodic case resolution and a serialized plot—the search for Delgado’s killer—creates fascinating and frustrating narrative tension. The episode format is like a buffet, where viewers can try out different cases, but the main story feels like an unfinished meal, leaving us wanting a deeper look into its themes. It’s as if the authors intended to serve a fancy meal but ended up with fast food (not the good kind).
Pacing is important here. The fast pace is meant to keep people interested, but it often makes for a crazy watching experience that puts action ahead of emotional connection. Since policing in the modern era is anything but slow, one might say that this is a deliberate choice. But as a result, moments that could have stayed and given us time to think or for characters to grow fly by like a police car on a fast chase.
In this whirlwind, viewers might find themselves entertained but not necessarily invested—an engagement paradox that begs reflection on the nature of modern storytelling in a society that wants things right away but wants things to go deeper.
Character Analysis: The Dynamics of Duty in “On Call”
Tracy Harmon embodies the archetypal “tough cop” trope with a blend of toughness and vulnerability. Loss, especially the death of her mentee, Officer Delgado, weighs heavily on her character and makes her seem less rigid than she is. Harmon works in an era where feelings are often seen as flaws, but her journey suggests a deeper struggle.
She is the perfect example of someone who always does what the rules say, even though the chaotic nature of her job makes this impossible. This inner struggle makes her interesting, but the writing sometimes simplifies her to predictable plot points, which takes away from the potential for in-depth investigation.
Then there’s Alex Diaz, the new police officer whose innocent eyes contrast Harmon’s tough exterior. The journey of Diaz, which is a strange mix of desire and inexperience, shows us some of the moral problems that recruits have to deal with. Even though his character has the potential to grow, he often stays underdeveloped, like a plant that doesn’t get enough sunlight.
He and Harmon’s dynamic shifts between guide and mentee and rivals questioning each other’s strategies. This relationship could have been a rich weave of different ideas, but it often feels stifled because the show is only in episodes.
Supporting characters like Sgt. Lasman and Lt. Bishop serve as the metaphorical “old guard,” representing a bygone era of policing that holds on to archaic ideas of authority and toughness. Lasman’s stern personality and clear-cut arguments are very different from Diaz’s more modern and thoughtful style.
Despite not being as prominent in the narrative, Bishop embodies the bureaucratic pressures that frequently suppress individual officers’ instincts. The conflicting themes of tradition versus progress within the police force are furthered by these characters, even though they are not always fully developed.
But there’s a catch: these secondary characters add to the story’s background, but they also risk becoming caricatures, which are oversimplified versions of bigger societal problems. The show references the complexities of their motives, but it never really goes into them. While fulfilling their narrative purpose, the cast frequently takes away from the main plot’s potential depth, leaving viewers wanting a more nuanced picture of the forces at play in the Long Beach Police Department.
Themes and Social Commentary: Policing in the Age of “On Call”
“On Call” attempts to navigate the dangerous waters of modern policing, but it’s debatable whether it succeeds or just floats aimlessly. The series presents a commentary on modern law enforcement that veers between being insightful and superficial, frequently giving viewers just enough to make them think without delving too deeply into the complexities of its topic.
Behind the characters of Harmon and Diaz, there is a clear gap between generations that runs through the whole series. Harmon presents the old guard, or those who adhere to established rules and conventional ideas of authority, with her no-nonsense approach.
The rookie Diaz, on the other hand, grapples with the moral conundrums of a new era. His inner battle reflects the larger societal tensions surrounding policing today, where calls for reform and accountability clash with the legacy of “tough on crime” policies. The show’s attempts to look into these moral problems are admirable, but they often feel like they’re not giving it their all, leaving viewers wanting more from the dialogue.
Another important aspect of the series is how it depicts police-community interactions, and “On Call” falls into the murky seas of propaganda in this regard. The show attempts to make the police officers more likable, but it also risks reinforcing negative ideas about already underrepresented groups. A lot of the time, homeless people are shown as either victims or bothersome, which lacks nuance and reduces complicated social problems to plot devices. This oversimplification may offend viewers who want a more true reflection of the social dynamics at play.
The series also presents a somewhat clean view of police work, avoiding the systemic problems that plague law enforcement. Although there are hints of self-awareness—characters lament the “woke” culture that complicates policing—these moments frequently feel more like window dressing than real analysis. In this sense, “On Call” embodies a cultural paradox: it seeks to make a point about the development of policing while sticking to archaic narratives, leaving its commentary both pertinent and frustratingly one-dimensional.
As the series navigates these themes, it makes us wonder how it has affected culture. Does it challenge viewers to reevaluate their views on policing, or is it just a reflection of the status quo? “On Call” finds itself at a crossroads, where the potential for deeper involvement exists but is often tantalizingly out of reach when the conversation surrounding law enforcement is more important than ever.
Stylistic Approach: The Visual Language of “On Call”
“On Call” uses various visual methods, with bodycam footage being the main focus. This choice of style is both unique and, at times, confusing. By putting viewers right into the chaotic world of policing, this first-person perspective seeks to provide an immersive experience.
While the goal may be to make the narrative more realistic, it often feels like a trick to draw attention away from the story’s flaws. (One could even come up with the word “camerawash” to describe a stream of shaky video that hides rather than shows.)
The color editing choices make the series look even more complicated. A grayscale color scheme that makes you think of how sad city life can attempt to instill a sense of seriousness and urgency in the viewer. However, this style can flatten the emotional landscape, turning potential poignant moments into a black-and-white blur. The series seems to be trying to show how bad police work is, but in doing so, it might take away from the beauty of human life.
The general tone jumps back and forth between harsh realism and dramatic embellishment, making for an uneasy balance. The show tries to be both a rough documentary and a slick procedural, but it often fails at both. When characters say things that feel more planned than genuine, scenes that should be emotionally powerful can sometimes turn into melodrama.
As the series attempts to incorporate these stylistic choices into its narrative, it becomes clear that while the visuals are meant to make the story seem real, they often serve as a reminder of how fake things are. “On Call” grapples with the challenge of standing out in a sea of cop shows, but its style begs the question of what it seeks to say.
Narrative and Plot Dynamics: The Architecture of “On Call”
The “On Call” episodic structure presents an odd blend of stand-alone cases and an overarching narrative, all packed into a half-hour format that leaves little room for nuance. Even though each episode seems to stand alone, it all fits into the bigger story of Officer Delgado’s murder, a thread that, despite its potential for emotional impact, often feels like a quilt seam that has only been partially sewn together.
The series attempts to increase tension and stakes, but the fast-paced action frequently deters from the emotional impact of key moments. Maybe it’s like trying to enjoy a fine wine at a fast food drive-thru—you don’t have time to enjoy the taste.
The case of the week is solved by the end of the plot, leaving viewers with the comforting predictability of a well-worn story. Plot development tends to follow a formulaic rhythm. Even though there are sometimes moving moments, this structure tends to lower the emotional stakes. Some character lines, like Harmon’s, hint at deeper problems but often turn into normal police work, making them more archetypal than real.
People are interested in police procedurals because they give them a rush of energy, but they also use a lot of tired clichés that can make them feel like last week’s donuts. The narrative veers dangerously close to being predictable, from the rookie’s mistakes to the wise old veteran era’s words. Some episodes do manage to add something new to the formula, but the show’s overall reliance on tired tropes can make longtime viewers long for something new.
“On Call” has to navigate a fine line between interesting storytelling and the dangers of predictability in an era where audiences are becoming more savvy. Its narrative choices make us wonder if the series reflects its genre or if there was a missed chance for more in-depth exploration.
Final Thoughts on “On Call”: Balancing Act in the Procedural Landscape
“On Call” presents a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses, veering between real insight moments and the all-too-common problems of the police procedural genre. Timeless good vs. evil themes are mixed with attempts to make the story relevant to today, making for an interesting but cluttered tapestry. Although the series has the potential to interest viewers, especially those who enjoy the thrill of police work, it frequently skips over depth in favor of speed.
If viewers like tales with strong characters, the series may give them a glimpse of what could have been, especially in the dynamic between Harmon and Diaz. However, viewers looking for new ideas or a different take on policing might find the trip formulaic and predictable.
“On Call” might be good for casual viewers and people who like traditional cop shows, but it might not be for people who want a more in-depth look at social problems. It does, however, provide a lot of material for discussion. Whether this is a sign of its quality or a reflection of the missed chances is open to opinion.
The Review
On Call
With a mix of interesting moments and well-worn tropes, "On Call" attempts to navigate the complexities of modern policing. The series frequently relies on predictability and doesn't explore social problems in greater depth despite showing potential through characters and time travel. Casual viewers might enjoy it because of its episodic structure, but those who want a deep narrative may find it lacking. At the end of the day, "On Call" is a dangerous mix of exciting police drama and simple storylines.
PROS
- Engaging character dynamics, particularly between Harmon and Diaz.
- Incorporates contemporary themes relevant to modern policing.
CONS
- Predictable plotlines and reliance on clichés.
- Lack of deeper exploration into societal issues.
- Episodic structure may dilute emotional stakes.
- Visual aesthetics can feel monotonous at times.
