Werewolves’ premise is ambitious and absurd: a supermoon—a celestial phenomenon long idealized in poetry and folklore—causes a global transformation, converting the populace into voracious lycanthropes. This concept straddles the line between horror and dark comedy, conjuring up an almost whimsical yet terrifying vision of social collapse.
The notion that simply moonlight might cause such a seismic shift in human behaviour is a metaphor for the latent chaos simmering beneath the surface of civilized society. One can’t help but compare historical occurrences, such as the chaotic aftermath of revolutions or the abrupt outbreak of societal terror during pandemics, where the veneer of order is stripped away, revealing our fundamental instincts.
Wesley Marshall (Frank Grillo) is at the centre of this chaos, a character whose muscular arrogance masks a deeper weakness. His past, the loss of his brother in the previous supermoon disaster, provides a personal stake that resonates with viewers in a world where the line between protector and protected has become dangerously blurred. As Wesley and his team, led by the slightly clichéd but endearing Dr. Aranda (Lou Diamond Phillips), work to develop a medicine to offset the moon’s effects, they represent the human battle against tremendous odds.
The stakes are clear: the impending supermoon threatens physical transformation and societal catastrophe. Will civilization rise to the challenge or descend into a night of ferocious violence and primordial instincts?
In a world of chaos, the film discreetly criticizes our reliance on scientific intervention as a cure for existential concerns. As the characters navigate a dangerous landscape rife with werewolves and human depravity, the film encourages viewers to question if mankind, stripped of its civilized veneer, can genuinely be redeemed or if it is condemned to become its own greatest enemy.
A Howl in the Night: Analyzing the Structure and World of Werewolves
Werewolves’ narrative structure oscillates between taut suspense and perplexing lulls—an unusual blend evocative of a poorly tuned radio station, where one moment you’re keyed into the action and the next you’re left with static.
The film’s opening scene presents the impending supermoon and its foreshadowing chaos. It sets a fast pace that gradually leads to predictable confrontations. Moments that feel more like necessary checkpoints than genuine plot developments interrupt Wesley Marshall’s trek through a city on the brink of chaos.
The pacing is strangely inconsistent. Just as tension builds—often through masterfully orchestrated moments of close encounters with werewolves—the film veers into lengths of talk that feel more like fluff than substance. (One could coin this the “werewolf pacing paradox”: the more exciting the premise, the less interesting the execution.) The high-stakes survival narrative is reduced by clichéd conversations and predictable character journeys, which undermines the premise’s urgency.
The film’s backdrop, an unknown urban area, serves as both a canvas and a character in and of itself. The choice to depict a city that survives relatively unscathed—despite a billion werewolves running amok—calls into doubt the plausibility of its world-building. One would expect a sense of global disaster, possibly similar to the aftermath of a zombie apocalypse (think 28 Days Later). Still, the streets feel strangely empty rather than devastated. This choice could be seen as a statement on societal denial in the face of disaster; we are left with a veneer of routine as chaos looms.
Furthermore, the film alluded to bigger societal themes, specifically the disparity between the government’s poor response to such an existential crisis and the hero’s desire for forgiveness. This dissonance reflects real-world apathy concerning impending global risks, such as climate change or public health crises. Thus, while Werewolves intends to be a survival horror spectacle, it accidentally raises broader concerns about humanity’s willingness to confront its anxieties when the moon shines brightly, and the creatures howl.
Beneath the Fur: Unpacking Character Dynamics in Werewolves
Wesley Marshall, played with rough swagger by Frank Grillo, embodies the reluctant hero archetype—his motivations stem from a personal tragedy that unfolds like a well-worn narrative.
The death of his brother during the previous supermoon event serves not only as a catalyst for his character but also as a lens through which the audience is urged to consider issues of grief and atonement. Wesley’s trip through a city overrun by werewolves symbolizes survival and closure. However, while his past provides insight, it appears locked to a conventional structure, leaving little room for further investigation. (This could be called the “grief narrative cliché,” in which personal loss drives action but lacks the subtlety to elevate it.)
Supporting characters, such as Amy Chen (Katrina Law) and Dr. Aranda (Lou Diamond Phillips), are essentially plot devices rather than fully developed persons. Amy’s job as a scientist coping with ethical quandaries around the “moon screen” treatment suggests potential complexity, yet her development remains basically flat. Similarly, Aranda plays the traditional authority figure—well-intentioned but ultimately ineffective—who just reinforces the film’s greater condemnation of bureaucratic approaches to crises.
The dynamics between these characters frequently alternate between friendliness and conflict. Yet, formulaic conversation and shallow interactions frequently undermine the emotional stakes. Wesley’s relationship with his sister-in-law, Lucy (Ilfenesh Hadera), adds a layer of familial obligation. Still, it rarely goes beyond the typical “protect the loved ones” trope. The film’s lack of major character arcs raises questions about whether its objectives are tied to its B-movie beginnings rather than a broader cultural statement.
In a world where the spectacle of transformation frequently overshadows the characters, the question remains: can these figures overcome their archetypal confines to provide something deeper, or are they doomed to remain just pieces in a chaotic lunar chess game?
The Art of Transformation: Technical Execution in Werewolves
Werewolves’ technical execution is a fascinating mix of practical effects and CGI, particularly depicting lycanthropy. The film’s dedication to practical effects, created by prominent artists Alec Gillis and Tom Woodruff Jr., is admirable, with several werewolves intended to evoke a physical response.
The prominent “punk rock werewolf,” complete with a nose ring and rebellious flare, is a striking representation of the film’s attempt to instil personality in its monstrous cast. This character is a cultural reflection of subversion, suggesting that individuality remains relevant even in chaos. However, the overall effectiveness of these designs is frequently hampered by clunky CGI during transformation scenes, which, despite their ambition, lack the visceral authenticity of their physical counterparts.
The mismatch between these two modes makes doubt the film’s artistic vision. Are the filmmakers seeking to create a new horror experience or paying respect to legendary creature features? (This could be described as the “identity crisis of monster cinema.”) The result is a visual experience that oscillates between entertaining and startling, with genuinely scary moments tempered by digital mistakes that evoke more eye rolls than gasps.
Werewolves adopts a cinematographic style that oscillates between spectacular and overindulgent, particularly with its constant use of lens flares. While these flares can create an exciting mood, they frequently go beyond, overshadowing critical moments of action and suspense. The lighting strategy goes toward a candy-coloured palette, which, while visually appealing, may detract from the film’s darker themes.
Editing choices disrupt the narrative flow. Rapid cuts during action sequences can create a sense of chaos. Still, this strategy often compromises clarity for style, leaving the audience puzzled rather than delighted. The uneven pacing, accentuated by these editing choices, represents a film that struggles to maintain thematic coherence in the visual spectacle. While technically ambitious, the result is a film that exposes the challenges of matching originality with narrative fidelity in the world of monster movies.
The Duality of Beasts: Themes and Tone in Werewolves
At its core, Werewolves explores significant issues of survival, family, and the fragility of societal structures. The reappearance of the supermoon serves as a catalyst for both physical and moral breakdown in the film, which depicts a world on the brink of catastrophe.
This scene inspires philosophical considerations concerning the horror that is inherent in humans. In our most desperate moments, are we only one transformation away from savagery? The film contends that beneath the veneer of civilization lurks a primitive impulse waiting to be unleashed, a notion that recalls historical occurrences in which societal standards have crumbled—whether during wars, pandemics, or civil upheaval.
The familial links highlighted in Wesley’s attempt to protect his sister-in-law and niece lend a layer of emotional weight to the story, suggesting that even amid the chaos, the desire for familial connection may lead people to heroic acts. However, this concept is frequently overpowered by the stunning spectacle of monstrous transformation, resulting in a tonal mismatch.
Werewolves aims to mix horror, action, and humour in its genre, but the execution falls short. The film oscillates between actual stressful moments and absurdity, frequently leaving the audience confused about how to react. (Is this a horror film or a campy romp? Perhaps we might coin it a “horror-comedy-action-thriller,” a mouthful that hardly suits.) The humour, while occasionally effective—such as Wesley’s cheeky one-liners—often appears forced in the face of terrible violence.
This tonal contradiction elevates audience expectations: are they looking for a thrilling horror encounter or a lighthearted adventure through lycanthropic chaos? The film’s effort to establish a unified identity represents a greater cultural critique of our current cinematic world, in which genre blending frequently results in confusion rather than innovation. Werewolves thus serves as both a reflection and a critique of contemporary genre norms, emphasizing the challenges of balancing audience expectations in an increasingly fragmented market.
Howling for Attention: Audience Engagement in Werewolves
Werewolves surely seek to grab horror and action fans’ hearts (or throats). The film’s premise—an apocalyptic scenario in which a supermoon transforms mankind into ravenous beasts—offers an instant hook that resonates with genre aficionados seeking a mix of excitement and fear. The visceral thrill of survival against overwhelming odds is a fundamental component that keeps people interested, even if the execution occasionally falls short of its ambition.
Moments of fun, notably Wesley’s quick one-liners, inject much-needed humour into the continuous chaos. Lines like “Bite me!” are delivered with a smirk, reminding viewers that, while the stakes are great, the film does not take itself too seriously. This self-awareness might be a welcome break in a genre frequently weighed down by solemnity. Still, it also raises concerns about tonal consistency.
Despite its many shortcomings, which range from predictable storylines to uneven pacing, Werewolves retains an intriguing pulse. It fills a unique niche in the werewolf genre, straddling the line between tribute and parody. While it may not reach the heights of classics like An American Werewolf in London, it does provide enough thrills and absurdity to satisfy a late-night audience seeking monster feature escapism. In this sense, Werewolves may not redefine the genre. Still, it is a hearty, if imperfect, addition to the continuous howl of lycanthropic film.
Final Thoughts on Werewolves: A Howl of Ambition
Werewolves is a strange blend of ambition and errors. Its creative premise—transforming a supermoon into a harbinger of chaos—provides fertile ground for horror and societal commentary, but the execution sometimes falters due to cliché and uneven pacing. While it appeals to genre lovers with moments of levity and exhilarating action, it struggles to maintain a consistent tone.
Finally, for those looking for a campy, creature-feature escape, Werewolves delivers a gory good time. Don’t expect it to redefine the werewolf genre; it’s more of a howl than a roar.
The Review
Werewolves
Werewolves is an ambitious but imperfect horror genre entry that combines campy humour with action-packed chaos. While the film's creative premise and practical effects provide moments of entertainment, it ultimately struggles with pacing, character development, and tonal consistency. It may appeal to genre fans looking for a lighthearted adventure, but those seeking depth or innovation may be disappointed. In the world of werewolf films, it howls rather than roars, making it a decent, if forgettable, addition.
PROS
- Engaging premise with a unique twist on the werewolf legend.
- Practical effects and creature designs are visually appealing.
- Some humorous one-liners provide levity.
CONS
- Inconsistent pacing undermines tension.
- Character development feels shallow and clichéd.
- Tonal shifts between horror, action, and humor can be jarring.
- CGI transformations lack the impact of practical effects.
- Predictable plot points diminish overall suspense.
