In Nouvelle Vague, Richard Linklater returns to the monochrome crucible of cinema’s youth, fashioning a 2024 sight-and-sound echo of Paris in 1959. Shot in French, framed in an Academy-ratio canvas, and rendered in high-contrast black-and-white, the film dramatizes Jean-Luc Godard’s birth-pangs as he conceives Breathless. Here, every gutter of light is an invitation to the unexpected, and each scratch of jazz on the soundtrack feels like a pulse in the night.
Linklater sets the scene on rain-slicked cobblestones and in cafés where cigarette smoke coils like a whispered confession. His camera glides past ragged film magazines and cluttered editing rooms, reminding us that creation can be brutal, thrilling, and absurd.
Through whispered arguments and bright-eyed determination, the story of Godard’s 20-day shoot unfolds as both homage and meditation on artistic risk. An affectionate portrait of youthful revolt, this opening gesture throbs with restless energy—an invitation to wonder whether art is ever truly under our control, or if we are merely conduits for its darker impulses.
Fractured Time and the Alchemy of Chance
Linklater arranges events with clinical clarity—Godard’s simmering envy of Truffaut and Chabrol blooms into a frantic quest for financing, then detonates over a 20-day whirlwind of shooting and editing. The narrative arcs forward without illusion: we witness the director siphoning cash from Cahiers du Cinéma, haggling with his producer, then sprinting into Paris streets clutching scraps of dialogue.
Each morning, Godard scribbles lines on café napkins and dispenses them like cryptic riddles to his cast. Actors learn their roles in real time, inhaling words as they emerge, and when inspiration evaporates, he simply calls it quits—an empty studio until the muse returns. That improvisational rule both liberates and torments, as if creativity itself were a fickle deity.
Moments where film and reality bleed together feel hallucinatory. On day one, the crew stands in a half-lit boulevard with nothing but a single camera and a phantom plan—cinema born from absence. In the editing room, a deluge of footage is trimmed through brutal jump cuts, sculpting coherence from chaos.
Scattered encounters with Rossellini, Melville and Bresson punctuate the storyline, offering cryptic wisdom that haunts Godard long after their cameo. These philosopher-filmmakers appear like specters, reminding us that art may ask endless questions but seldom supplies comforting answers.
Masks of Light and Shadow
Guillaume Marbeck’s Godard glides into view behind perpetual sunglasses—an intentional barrier that both conceals and magnifies his inner turbulence. In quiet cafés, he scribbles dialogue like a philosopher scrawling last rites, his arrogance flickering against moments of brittle self-doubt: a tremor in his voice as he bargains with Georges de Beauregard, then a quiet triumph in the editing suite when his vision, at last, coalesces. Marbeck balances the callous wit of an auteur with the fragile yearning of a man who fears his own emptiness.
Aubry Dullin’s Jean-Paul Belmondo is a study in kinetic levity. He hops rope in the courtyard, cracking a grin even as Godard’s impatience thickens the air. Yet when he staggers bloodied through the final pursuit, there is an implicit question carved into his bruised cheek: what remains of performance when the body aches for authenticity? Dullin’s ease masks an existential core—he is the everyman who performs heroism for a director hungry to capture “reality.”
Zoey Deutch’s Jean Seberg drifts into the fray with a Hollywood glow that rapidly corrodes under the weight of improvisation. Her frustration—voiced in trembling asides, in moments when she whispers “Why?” to the empty set—becomes a meditation on the cost of faith in art. She is torn between the glamour she embodies and the gritty uncertainty that her role demands.
Raoul Coutard (Matthieu Penchinat) moves like a silent guardian, his camera a shield against chaos. And when Truffaut, Melville or Bresson flit through the frame—spectral mentors offering riddles—they remind us that every performance is both homage and revolution, a fleeting communion between flesh and idea.
The Aesthetics of Memory and Decay
In Nouvelle Vague, each frame feels like a fading photograph, grainy and alive with the patina of time. David Chambille’s camera breathes in deep blacks and corrosive highlights, as though Paris itself were exhaling smoke through a cracked lens. Handheld tracking shots glide down boulevards with restless persistence, and long takes in real locations collapse the divide between spectator and street, invoking Merleau-Ponty’s notion of embodied perception—film as lived experience, never fully graspable.
Interior spaces—Cahiers du Cinéma’s cramped office, dimly lit cafés, narrow hotel rooms—are rendered with forensic devotion. Every chipped table edge and peeling wallpaper whispers of bygone ambitions. Costumes echo the era without exaggeration: Seberg’s pixie cut, Belmondo’s aviators, tailored suits that carry both defiance and fragility. They dress bodies burdened by the promise of immortality on celluloid.
The soundtrack pulses with smoky jazz and dance tunes, a heartbeat both seductive and foreboding. On set, the absence of sync sound becomes a philosophical stance: dialogue recorded in post dissolves certainty, as if memory itself were always slightly off-register. Natural ambient noise seeps in—a distant horn, a dog’s bark—reminding us that reality resists containment.
Editing and VFX unite necessity with homage: jump cuts cleave scenes to their barest essence, while digital alchemy erases modern intrusions. In the editing suite, we glimpse cinema’s secret heart—an obscured ritual where chaos is distilled into fleeting coherence, and the illusion of control reveals its own fragility.
Echoes of Rebellion and Creation
Here, the struggle between creative freedom and industrial order becomes a philosophical crucible: Godard’s nightly jottings on café napkins stand in defiance of his producer’s demand for a tidy script. The tension crackles like an electric fault line, asking whether true art can survive beneath contractual constraints or if it must erupt, unpolished and raw.
The film’s DIY ethos is a testament to audacity: a skeleton crew, a camera hidden in a mail cart, natural light as both tool and metaphor for unfiltered reality. Each inventive workaround underscores cinema as a live experiment—an act of survival against scarcity.
Linklater’s homage extends an invitation to those unversed in Breathless, yet the nods to cinephile lore never overshadow the story’s self-sufficiency. Fleeting title cards and whispered cameos become cryptic runes, rewarding the initiated without alienating the curious.
This resurrection of 1959’s creative ferocity resonates in today’s independent landscape, where making a film can still feel like chasing lightning—an impossible task that, when it strikes, redefines what remains possible. Nouvelle Vague premiered at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival on May 17, 2025, competing for the Palme d’Or.
Full Credits
Director: Richard Linklater
Writers: Vincent Palmo Jr., Holly Gent, Laetitia Masson, Michèle Halberstadt
Producers: Laurent Pétin, Michèle Pétin, Richard Linklater, Mike Blizzard, John Sloss
Executive Producers: Emmanuel Montamat, John Sloss
Cast: Guillaume Marbeck, Zoey Deutch, Aubry Dullin, Bruno Dreyfürst, Benjamin Clery, Matthieu Penchinat, Pauline Belle, Blaise Pettebone, Benoît Bouthors, Paolo Luka Noé, Adrien Rouyard, Jade Phan-Gia, Jodie Ruth-Forest, Antoine Besson, Roxane Rivière, Côme Thieulin, Jean-Jacques Le Vessier, Laurent Mothe, Jonas Marmy, Niko Ravel
Director of Photography (Cinematographer): David Chambille
Editor: Catherine Schwartz
The Review
Nouvelle Vague
Nouvelle Vague pulses with restless ingenuity, an homage that transcends nostalgia to become its own meditation on creation and chaos. Linklater’s black-and-white canvas and spontaneous rhythms conjure both the punk spirit of Godard and the uneasy beauty of impermanence. Through luminous performances and grain-soaked frames, the film reminds us that cinema remains a daring gamble—one that, when it lands, captures lightning in a bottle.
PROS
- Evocative black-and-white cinematography that immerses you in 1959 Paris
- Lively, inventive recreation of Godard’s improvised shooting method
- Strong central performance by Guillaume Marbeck as the enigmatic auteur
- Rich period detail in production design and soundtrack
- Engaging interplay between historical homage and fresh storytelling
CONS
- Dense cinephile references may alienate viewers unfamiliar with Breathless
- Occasional narrative fragmentation mirroring its own jump-cut aesthetic
- Some supporting characters feel under-explored
