A Tudor statute still casting a shadow over queer lives in Namibia, Barbados, and Sri Lanka sounds like the kind of historical link a documentary might strain to prove. Out Laws does the opposite. Lexi Powner and James Lewis take a clean, direct route from Friedel Dausab’s legal challenge in Namibia to the Buggery Act of 1533, then let the distance between those points become the film’s quiet shock.
Dausab filed his case in June 2022 to challenge laws criminalising same-sex relationships in Namibia. That gives the film its narrative spine, and it is a strong one because the court case is never treated as an abstract reform effort. The law has a face here, and so does the danger of fighting it. Dausab is gentle, nervous, funny, and plainly aware that placing his name at the front of this case means accepting public risk.
That human scale matters. The film’s subject is vast: empire, law, religion, violence, and the long afterlife of colonial power. Its best choice is to begin with one man sitting inside that history rather than explaining the history first.
Three Activists in the Same Weather
Powner and Lewis widen the film through two other activists who meet Dausab in London: Raven Gill, a trans activist from Barbados and executive director of Butterfly Barbados, and Rosanna Flamer-Caldera, the Sri Lankan advocate behind EQUAL GROUND. Each person arrives with a different legal fight behind them, which keeps the documentary from flattening queer rights across the Global South into one story.
Gill brings sharp confidence to the film, especially in the London Pride material, where public celebration sits beside the knowledge that Caribbean legal victories can still leave cultural hostility intact. Flamer-Caldera carries a steadier force. Her work through the United Nations and her long wait for Sri Lankan government action show how legal recognition can become another stalled promise once the cameras move away.
Dausab remains the emotional anchor because his case is still unfolding. The film returns to him with a greater sense of pressure after it has shown what similar victories mean elsewhere. By then, the viewer understands that a ruling in his favor would matter in practical ways, yet would not erase the fear that made the case necessary.
Also Read
I appreciated how the documentary lets these three personalities breathe. Dausab’s modest humor, Gill’s spark, and Flamer-Caldera’s calm authority give the film warmth without softening the stakes. That balance is harder than it looks.
Pride, Close-Ups, and the Act of Being Seen
The London Pride sequences could have become easy uplift, but the film uses them with care. Trafalgar Square gives Dausab, Gill, and Flamer-Caldera a stage, yet it also gives the documentary a visual contrast: bodies moving freely in a city that once produced the legal language used to police queer bodies elsewhere.
That contradiction does plenty of work. The crowds cheer, flags fill the frame, and the activists receive public affection, but the film never mistakes that weekend of safety for liberation everywhere. It is a pause, not a finish line.
Formally, Powner and Lewis keep the film brisk through photo montages, archive material, interviews, and direct testimony. The frequent extreme close-ups are not subtle, but they are effective. Faces fill the screen as if the camera is correcting a historical erasure. Dausab’s nervous smile before the court ruling, Gill’s playful command in public, Flamer-Caldera’s composed gaze during advocacy discussions: the framing insists that law’s victims are never footnotes.
The editing also helps translate a difficult legal history into something legible. I like documentaries that trust the audience without making them work through a fog of names and dates. Here, the 1533 Act, colonial export, Commonwealth inheritance, and present-day activism are arranged with clarity. You can feel the educational intent, but it rarely feels like a lecture.
A Short Film Facing a Huge History
The film’s most persuasive historical move is its treatment of law as technology. The Buggery Act of 1533 did not merely punish queer people in Tudor England. Through empire, similar legal codes traveled, settled, and became instruments of social control in places where they were later defended as tradition. That is the bitter irony Out Laws keeps pressing: many of these laws are framed as local moral order, yet their roots lie in colonial rule.
The documentary supports this argument through historians, lawyers, politicians, and activists, then stretches it into the present through discussion of American evangelical influence in parts of Africa. That material is urgent, and it is also where the film’s 79-minute shape starts to feel tight. The role of US religious campaigning deserves deeper attention. Namibia’s layered colonial history, involving German, South African, and British influence, also asks for a little extra space.
Still, the compression does not break the film. It creates a different kind of documentary: concise, accessible, and emotionally direct, with enough historical scaffolding to make the personal stories land harder. Images of people targeted and killed for their sexuality give the legal argument its coldest proof. These are not dusty statutes being debated for academic interest. They are living mechanisms of fear.
The final return to Dausab’s case gains force because the film has made the ruling feel connected to centuries of language, violence, and resistance. A court decision becomes a single crack in a much older wall. The camera stays close enough to see what that crack costs.
The British-Namibian feature documentary Out Laws celebrated its world premiere at the BFI Flare: London LGBTQIA+ Film Festival on March 23, 2026. Audiences tracking its path can catch the production as it traverses the global festival circuit, with scheduled summer stops including the Queer Spectrum Film Festival and the ALT* LGBT+ Documentary Film Festival in Mexico City. The narrative follows activist Friedel Dausab as he initiates a high-stakes constitutional lawsuit to decriminalize same-sex relationships in Namibia, exposing the dark legacy of colonial laws while connecting his local battle to wider international human rights struggles in Sri Lanka and Barbados.
Full Credits
Title: Out Laws
Distributor: The New Black Film Collective, BFI Flare
Release date: March 23, 2026
Running time: 79 minutes
Director: Lexi Powner, James Lewis
Writers: James Lewis
Producers and Executive Producers: James Lewis
Cast: Friedel Dausab, Rosanna Flamer-Caldera, Raven Gill
Director of Photography (Cinematographer): Lexi Powner, James Lewis
Editors: Lexi Powner
Composer: The Good Side
The Review
Out Laws
Out Laws turns legal history into lived pressure with clarity, warmth, and purpose. Lexi Powner and James Lewis make colonial law feel painfully present through Friedel Dausab’s case, then widen the frame through Raven Gill and Rosanna Flamer-Caldera without losing human texture. Its short runtime leaves major threads underfed, especially American evangelical influence and Namibia’s layered colonial past, yet the film’s directness gives it real force.
PROS
- Clear historical argument
- Strong activist portraits
- Moving London Pride scenes
- Accessible legal framing
- Warm, humane tone
CONS
- Runtime feels tight
- Evangelical influence needs space
- Namibia’s colonial history feels compressed
- Some close-ups feel heavy-handed
